The problem with subjective morality?

Question

I notice people often think morality is subjective and is a view held differently by each person. I beg to differ, there is always one way that is moral and anyother way is wrong and immoral. To state this here is one argument. A man kills a baby to him that act is moral but to the other person it is not, who is right in this situation? the man who kills the baby is not moral despite what he thinks, he is just plain wrong. It might be hard to figure out who is right about what is moral but only one is right. Can you tell me your own personal standpoint on what is moral? Please don't just say whatever he or she thinks it is, please explain why that is so. Remember just because someone thinks something is moral does not make it moral. Just because you think 2+2=5 it does not. Prove to me that morality is objective or subjective. If you think it is not fact explain why, if you think morality is just fact explain why as well.

(to the first guy that answers) There is an answer to that, and only one but i might make the wrong one since i do not know which is right but just because i do not know does not make them both correct. Only one of the choice would be moral the other simply would not be. So would killing the baby be moral or the adults? Dunno but they cannot be both moral. There is always one correct answer, just because you don't know doesn't make it both correct.

Well can't the culture be wrong? just because there are multiple cultures with different morality traits doesn't mean they are all correct. Of course a culture can be morally incorrect. Just because that culture accepts it to be morality does not make it moral.

Having 2 correct answers that would be vice versa with each other cannot exist.

Answer 1

What if killing the baby would save the lives of 4 adults? Now what is moral? To allow the adults to die? Or allow the baby to die so 4 others can live and reproduce?

What if allowing a train to hit a man but allowing 8 others to live on anoher track is presented to you?

Now imagine that you actually have to push one very large man in front of the train to save those 8? This is where many people get thrown and have no simple answer. Just the very fact that there are differences in answers to this shows it it subjective.

Sorry, but you don't have all the answers in every single situation about what is moral.

Another easy poser is abortion. You really think the 55%-60% of americans who approve of abortion are immoral?

EDIT
You seem to have some idea that morality is written in the stars or something. The very fact that morality is about doing the right thing and educated adults can't agree on the answer shows you that it is subjective. It's just like "What is good art?" "What is the best movie ever made?" By definition, these things will be subjective. Just like morality.

Answer 2

Can a culture be wrong? I'll try this:
An army is besieging a walled city. The general of the army sends a message in. The message says that if the people send him one child to kill, he and his army will leave the city in peace. If they do not, he will order his army to break down the gates and kill everyone inside.
What is the moral thing for the people to do?
Some cultures might say that the people should refuse, showing morality in fighting to the last.
Other cultures might say that the people should send a child out. Children die, and this child's death would save the city; it's sacrifice would moral.
I don't think you can call a culture wrong or immoral simply because your morality doesn't match. People who belong to that culture are thinking the same about yours. Do you have an objective reason for calling your culture better? Morality is usually shaped by culture. Do you have an objective reason for calling your morality better? If you can't then I would say that morality is subjective. Fortunately, people tend to agree on the big stuff.

Answer 3

What food is for the physical body , moral values are for the imbedded soul. Depending upon the chemistry a certain type of food would suit one and not the other. So also, varieties of food have evolved in the various regions of the world. Today some sort of world integration ( in food) is taking place around the world.

So is morality. Your soul or inner consciousness tells you right or wrong. As for as YOu are concerned it is not subjective but for the others it is.

Society has , over a period of time, has eveolved a standard code of Morality and , now, the world has also startd to evolve one for the entire world. It is still a long way off from perfection but it is on the way.

Coming back to the Food anology I am a vegetarian and i feel killing animals for food is not correct. can I hold on to that dogma? I donot know.

Answer 4

What about other issues? For example, one parent might think it's morally okay to spank a child but another might think that's child abuse. Do you think you could get any sort of universal agreement on whether it's moral or immoral? Not in this day and age. What about killing someone? Most people think that, if somebody is trying to kill you or your family, and you have to kill them to stop it, that's morally okay -- the lesser of two evils. But there ARE people who believe it's morally wrong to kill under ANY circumstances. Can you PROVE which one is right or wrong?

There are thousands of factors influencing every decision. No one can dictate absolute morality.

Answer 5

Best book I ever read on the subject is "The Abolition of Man" by C.S. Lewis, in which he makes a case for moral axioms (like logical and mathematical axioms). He shows that in spite of differences in cultures and millenia, there seems to be a core of common moral values that are remarkably like the golden rule and the 10 commandments. Certainly it's easy enough to show that subjective morality is equivalent to no morality.

Answer 6

the worldwide we live in is the worldwide the place morality is subjective. Morality is many times recognized as purpose, yet being that there are maximum of perspectives of what's "ethical". there is not status, measurable information of morality. what's taught and is assumed of as ethical can fluctuate a great deal between distinctive cultures. occasion: In some tribal communities a female is married off at her first menstrual cycle- for some it rather is as youthful as 10 years previous. contained in america it is termed infant molestation and is deemed immoral. In some cultures the blood line is only traced by matralinial OR patralineal lines. this facilitates marriages between individuals who're genetically appropriate by way of the line that's considered. Siblings and familiar cousins blanketed. it rather is considered immoral right here to boot. In some cultures that's exceedingly ethical to kill human beings of opposing faiths- as history and the information are consistently recounting. In a worldwide the place morality grew to become into measurable and undeniable we does not see such excellent ameliorations in theory. There does not be faucet dancing around attempting to not offend anothers ideals of morals or going to conflict considering which you vehemently disagree with them

Answer 7

VERY SIMPLE!
it's moral when u do st to increase the happiness of others

it's immoral when u do st that increases the unhappiness

don't get lost in the viscious circle of what's right and wrong

and yes, everything, not only morality, is subjective

Socrates, Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed were all damned as subjective and immoral in their time

now they're the axes of whom the morality of the whole universe exists!

DIVAS
[e-mail]
deevas.hi5.com

Answer 8

The fact that each person can make a decision about such matters, When It involves another persons right to choose, it becomes immoral.
The baby could not say I want to die.

We must only decide for our own selves what is.

Gay rights / marriage moral?
Does it affect me? No I say.
I do not have to allow it in my life.

Child abuse? What is it?
A judge from Oregon defined Child abuse as leaving an actual mark on child.
By being absent from child and not providing for child.
By demoralizing with Hurtful words.
But he said it is not child abuse to spank or discipline your kids.
Therefor he has set the requirements for child abuse as such.

By law we are required to provide only the minimal nescessities for a child.

Each parent gets to choose what is right for their child until age 18.
After age 18 the child is free to move if they do not like rules.
Morality is the choice of each individual without causing harm to another.

Answer 9

Of course it's subjective.

Different cultures have different moral codes which continually evolve. Don't miss the boat.

Answer 10

you could get all these answers if you read the bible. god will tell you what is moral or not.