You know that sometimes history has a way of changing from the way things actually were, e.g. Reagan being considered a "uniter."
2007-02-06 13:21:09 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely he will be. Right after Stalin gets the "Most Humane Ruler" and Hitler gets the "Best Friend of the Jews" medals.
2007-02-06 13:25:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Reagan was never a 'uniter'. That was a myth, just like Bush is the 'decider' is a myth. Reagan had nothing to do with the fall of the USSR either. That system started crumbling very shortly after Brezchnev died. And, we all know that Cheney, rove and Rumsfeld are behind the curtains making the decisions.
2007-02-06 21:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
History has a way of seeing what the REAL longterm results of a person's actions were. Ronald Reagan was never considered a very good president. But now that we see what the results of his presidency were, he will be on currency, have roads and buildings named after him, be cast in a very bright light in the history books, etc etc.
Same thing for Clinton. He was considered one of the greatest presidents of all time, but now that we see the results of his criminal negligence, we are beginning to see a very negative light developing for his place in history.
As for Bush, we'll see. We already know of some of the great results of some of the things he has done. Ask this again in the year 2012.
2007-02-06 21:29:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actually Ronald Reagan was more famous for being the great communicator. He could sell ice to Eskimos and charm the icicles of your house eaves. To some degree he was a uniter he certainly was a cheer leader.
George W. Bush is supposed to be intellegent as he has an MBA from Yale. By his decisions and the way he talks one would have trouble believing he is intellegent.
2007-02-06 21:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He'll go down just as he wants to be labelled:
"The Decider"
most will recognize him for many bad decisions but hes the decider, for better or worse we are stuck for the next 1.5 yrs with the decider. Hope he doesnt decide to invade Iran and Venezuela. I hope he decides to listen to a smarter person than himself which is the american populace that had their election stolen and got him in office.
2007-02-06 21:36:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The people who continue to label the man as a complete moron will go down in history as the idiots.
2007-02-06 21:37:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
in a land of blindmen, the one-eyed man is king
2007-02-06 21:43:57 · answer #7 · answered by shazam 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only by his less intelligent followers.
2007-02-06 21:28:37 · answer #8 · answered by robert m 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
He is a very intelligent man. I have my doubts about you though.
2007-02-06 21:25:49 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You should have seen what he got on his SATs!!!
it was BBQ sauce!
2007-02-06 21:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by x_ill 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋