neither. go home from the gym, stop at Barnes & Noble, and buy a book. I'd rather have brains than muscles any day.
2007-02-06 14:16:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~Biz~ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Guy With Normal Upper And Lower Body Muscles And A 6 Pack.
2007-02-06 20:26:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ILY♥!! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends what is there in lieu of a 6 pack. If it's a boring flat stomact, then I'm cool with the big upper and lower body, but nice arms/legs and a big hairy beer gut isn't going to work.
2007-02-06 20:25:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by CHBN 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
big muscles look stupid, but who doesn't like a 6 pack? But i think your question is irrelevant because you can't really have big muscles and not have great abs. working the rest of your body would include your abs, even if you weren't specifically focusing on them. your body is connected.
2007-02-06 20:34:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by scruffy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Forget the muscles. Give me a guy with a well-developed brain any day.
2007-02-06 21:18:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by stormsinger1 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
six pack is better. I think having a little muscle is sexier than a lot. Having smooth arms is much better than lumpy bumpy arms.
2007-02-06 20:27:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Naomi P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im not too big on abs - usually a guy with abs makes too much of a point of letting as many girls as possible see them.
2007-02-06 20:23:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by radiancia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he had strong, protective arms, I'd chose the strong arms without a six-pack.
2007-02-06 20:25:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either one, connected to a clean well groomed, well spoken man with a great deal of confidence. It is not all about the body. God bless****
2007-02-06 20:23:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The second one.
2007-02-06 20:27:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Susie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋