English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

89-92 Jordan or 96-98 Jordan?

I would say jordan would have been best between 1993-1995 if he didn't retire..where he had 3 peat experience and the physical ability to take over young players..

2007-02-06 12:01:47 · 6 answers · asked by Better 1 in Sports Basketball

6 answers

it's 91-93 and 96-98 but yeah

I'd go with the second 3 peat just because it was harder at his age and he was still able to get it done

2nd 3 peat teams were also way more DOMINANT

72 wins is crazy

2007-02-06 12:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by truthistold2u 6 · 1 0

hard to answer, because jordan is the a person who always wants to win. he'll do anything to win the game.
if that means to score 69, then he'll do that. if that means to pass the ball to kerr to drain a 3, then he'll do that too.
therefore, in the first 3 peat, he saw what his team needed and react upon it, same went for the 2nd 3peat.
so i think he was equally good for the first and the second 3 peat.

2007-02-07 03:32:10 · answer #2 · answered by the_justin 3 · 0 0

The first 3 peat due to his youth, ability and supporting cast. The second 3 peat he had a good cast, but they were sometimes inconsistent & Rodman was explosive!

2007-02-06 20:13:30 · answer #3 · answered by Hammer 1 · 0 0

The latter Jordan since he accomplished more being an older athlete.....its more difficult!!

2007-02-06 20:05:25 · answer #4 · answered by RobLough 3 · 0 0

Definitely the first one.If he hadn't retired, the man would have eight championships.

2007-02-07 10:11:00 · answer #5 · answered by zebbie g 2 · 0 0

wat??? i luv basketball and i have not the slightest idea of wat ur talkn bout!!!

2007-02-06 21:41:20 · answer #6 · answered by Sexxi~Hot~Mama 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers