English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a) religious beliefs
b) upper-class backgrounds
c) conservative political views
d) reluctance to learn the English language

thanks!!

2007-02-06 11:46:21 · 7 answers · asked by beach blondie xox 2 in Arts & Humanities History

7 answers

A without a doubt. They were catholics coming to a mainly protestant country. If they were rich, why leave Ireland? They already speak English, although after a few beers I can't understand a word they say. Conservative political views would not be an issue at the turn of the century, unlike today.

2007-02-06 12:32:28 · answer #1 · answered by Tucson Hooligan 4 · 0 1

The answer they are asking for is (a) because the others are untrue. The major reason is because most were fleeing the potato famine and were disparately poor. Catholic from other countries at other times faced discrimination but not at the level that the Irish did.

2007-02-06 21:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 0 0

i ought to say all baby loose persons and couples face intrinsic discrimination is society. i'm Australian and we those days had a prevalent election for a clean federal authorities. in the course of the campaigning previous to the election, the politicians on both part were frantically attempting to out do one yet another in promoting tax breaks and particular funds and amenities for households and moms with little ones. for sure this grow to be no diverse from the different election contained in the previous. the point is that unmarried people subsidize the little ones of others by skill of better taxation. Govermental rules regard the needs of adults with little ones to be better major that that of childless adults. no man or woman tries to attraction to the vote of the childless adults, they don't look to be considered a valid demographic or perhaps to signify they're is many times regarded as something perverse. Politicians have even reported they're unashamedly professional-relatives biased of their rules and it really is purely an admission they're discriminatory (yet in a legal way on account that there are not any rules to guard unmarried people as a demographic). i'm childless via decision. i have self assurance that our international has far too a lot of people and diverse those who call for the right to little ones are really egocentric. in the journey that they have self assurance in little ones a lot, why not undertake extremely than supply the overburdened planet (and unmarried taxpayers) yet another mouth to freed?

2016-12-03 19:57:31 · answer #3 · answered by laranjeira 4 · 0 0

Depends in which country they were discriminated against....

... a) i guess...

2007-02-06 11:54:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The correct answer IS "A"

2007-02-06 17:18:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They were CATHOLICS!!!! choice "a".

2007-02-06 11:52:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

duh.

2007-02-06 11:49:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers