Unnecessary... for now... but if you are going to do that, thats it really... all out war with the middle east... let me know how it goes...
2007-02-06 11:47:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's the worst idea in the world, and I thought Iraq was until our moron president came up with something even more evil.
We have nukes - why shouldn't Iran? Who made us the world police?
We signed things like the Geneva convention, that say we will not go do war unless we are attacked. Another country having a nuclear capabiltiy is not an attack on the US.
2007-02-06 20:20:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by firefly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I appreciate your time posting this question. Yesterday I posted mine just wanting to know what the Americans thinks about the present administration asking for more two hundred forty-five billions of dollars and what would you do for that money. I got so many unique answers. In regards to your question from my own perspective: another war with another country will make our deficit in record breaking years. Why can't a president or the administration diplomatically talk things out on what's best for both parties. Sword for sword is not always an answer.
2007-02-06 19:52:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically we are already at war given the fact that Iran supplies weapons and training to insurgents who combat our liberation of Iraq. Our military will deal with this decisively and Iran better be backing off. I work with our military and believe me, Iran's military capability would last about as long as Iraq's....a few weeks, maybe a month. Thing is, these middle east dudes are crazy and cowardly for the most part with big mouths...just like most wife beaters.....now, our guys and gals are intelligent and willing to do what it takes like a well thought out football game, in fact, they say that is why we have the major military force in the world....because of tactical football, not pus*sy soccor, taught to our young people. That's what our battles have been like over here....a soccor team, taking on a football team....no contest except in a foot race running away...pus*sies.
2007-02-10 00:48:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by bill g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is an absolutely horrible idea since bhudda teaches us to love one another and try to find common ground to learn to live as brothers. With the leaders in U.S.A. now it is probably inevitable that blood will continue to spill all over the midlle east including u.s. soldiers blood. merciful bhudda
2007-02-06 19:52:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
INEVITABLE
They have oil
We need oil
We have bases in Iraq and Afghanistan
so
we will again try to democratize them as we did with the Shah! And we will have them "attack"us first.
( No premise in the above syllogism is invalid)
2007-02-07 06:44:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
lets look at what is going on in iraq first
25 million iraqis -absolute chaos 3000+ dead americans
thousands of marines injured
war just starting no where near ending.
_________________________now iran_____
80 million iranians, backing of china and russia. 4 years ready for war- middle eastern would join in of course and attack global targets
good luck
= recipe for millions dead
http://ca.blog.360.yahoo.com/antiwar_girl
2007-02-09 21:47:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran will attack first.. That stupid Bush doesn't even know what he is talking about..
2007-02-06 22:11:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ILSE 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush won't do it, the only reason he went to Iraq was to get reelected, now he has no reason to attack.
2007-02-06 19:47:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kristen L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they have nukes or are developing nukes....Bombs Away!!!!
2007-02-06 19:45:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by mr_methane_gasman 3
·
0⤊
2⤋