no mike vick = no ring sorry :(
2007-02-06 11:40:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by iamawesome 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the NFC, they certainly could get to the Superbowl but the AFC is much better so they wont win. I wish everyone would stop hounding Vick, the Falcons organization knew what they were getting when the drafted him and they failed to place the tools around him to get the most out of his ablities and help him develop into a passing threat.
2007-02-06 11:48:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by MJMGrand 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not see the Falcons winning the Super Bowl anytime soon, or at least not winning Super Bowl XLII in Arizona.
2007-02-06 11:46:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is a definitely possiblity but 2 things need to happen before they can win. First thing is they need to improve that defense. It is not a bad looking defense, but it can definitely use some beefing up.(defense wins ballgames) The second thing that needs to happen is to make Matt Schaub the starter. I think that mike vick like rex grossman. Is not the man you want at the trigger with the big game on the line. Vick makes dumb decisions, and he would rather run then pass. You will never win with a selfish QB.
2007-02-06 11:44:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shady 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 Words. More Depth
2007-02-06 11:41:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brandon M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
as long is vick is the qb the falcon's won't get a ring
2007-02-06 11:45:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by DoReidos 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anything is possible I am still waiting for the Giants to come back so keep on hoping
2007-02-06 11:46:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Junie Bug 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only with a miracle, hope, and a quarterback who throws instead of runs. The wide recievers have to be bored to death.
2007-02-06 11:46:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Just answer my questions 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. jim mora was hurting vick and the team. expect them to go to the superbowl within the next couple of years.
2007-02-06 11:42:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Smoothness 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
sorry man i dont think so not with vick
2007-02-06 11:43:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋