Who thinks a WWE wrestler can beat a UFC fighter. I don't think it can happen unless they get the right training. Come on be REALISTIC TOO!
2007-02-06
11:27:37
·
14 answers
·
asked by
C02
3
in
Sports
➔ Wrestling
I MEAN REAL LIFE PEOPLE UFC VS WWE IN OCTAGON OR STREET FIGHT OR SOMETHING THAT IS REAL
2007-02-06
11:31:53 ·
update #1
HHH VS ORTIZ HHH IS OLD HE WOULD GET TAKEN OUT IN A SPLIT SECOND!
2007-02-06
11:32:53 ·
update #2
FMJR R U TWO COME ON SCOTTY 2 HOTTY WOULD GO DOWN IN A SPLIT SECOND SO WOULD ANYONE ELSE!
2007-02-06
11:33:56 ·
update #3
THERE IS WOMAN CAGE FIGHTING BUT HECK BET YOU THEY CAN KILL CENA TOO THEY ARE RIPPED AND TOUGH
2007-02-06
11:34:40 ·
update #4
I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN SEXY BEYO BUT HONESTLY RVD MAY HAVE A BACKROUND BUT IT IS LIKE MUSCLE YOU MAY WORK OUT BUT AFTER YOU WORK OUT AND YOU EAT A LOT DOESNT MEAN YOU WONT GAIN WEIGHT. SO YOU DONT DO MMA FOR A WHILE MEANS YOU CAN FORGET SOME MOVES BOUT IT
2007-02-06
11:36:29 ·
update #5
Hmm...MMA vs. guys who fake throwing punches for a living...gotta give it to the MMA this time around.
2007-02-06 11:32:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Candle 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
THAT IS A REALLY GAY QUESTION MINE IS BETTER
Gay wrestling fans!?
These guys are stupid see what one guy wrote. My ? was that any UFC fighter can destroy any WWE wrestler
First of all dude, wrestling is not fighting. It is an art form. It is being able to step in the ring with a guy and tell a story. Your favorite, Khali, sux at doing that. I also hate how you say that no wrestler could beat a UFC fighter. I think you forgot about Kurt Angle or Chris Benoit. Those guys are great mat wrestlers and could take Khali or Tito Ortiz down in a second.
YEAH ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN YOURE RIGHT BUT COME ON THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE INJURED TO LOSE!
UFC v.s. WWE?
Who thinks a WWE wrestler can beat a UFC fighter. I don't think it can happen unless they get the right training. Come on be REALISTIC TOO!
I MEAN REAL LIFE PEOPLE UFC VS WWE IN OCTAGON OR STREET FIGHT OR SOMETHING THAT IS REAL
HHH VS ORTIZ HHH IS OLD HE WOULD GET TAKEN OUT IN A SPLIT SECOND!
FMJR R U TWO COME ON SCOTTY 2 HOTTY WOULD GO DOWN IN A SPLIT SECOND SO WOULD ANYONE ELSE!
THERE IS WOMAN CAGE FIGHTING BUT HECK BET YOU THEY CAN KILL CENA TOO THEY ARE RIPPED AND TOUGH
I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN SEXY BEYO BUT HONESTLY RVD MAY HAVE A BACKROUND BUT IT IS LIKE MUSCLE YOU MAY WORK OUT BUT AFTER YOU WORK OUT AND YOU EAT A LOT DOESNT MEAN YOU WONT GAIN WEIGHT. SO YOU DONT DO MMA FOR A WHILE MEANS YOU CAN FORGET SOME MOVES BOUT IT
2007-02-06 12:15:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by BUSHIDO 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If the fights were legit, meaning fighters fought against people near their own weight, then the only way a WWE fighter could win was by a lucky knock out. Both organizations have similar workout and conditioning ideals, hence why most of them are in great shape, barring WWE fatasses and roid ragers. But that is where the similarities end. WWE stars are not combat trained. They are skilled on the spot coreographers. Totaly different from people who commit their time to bona fide martial arts. Now what would be interesting is open weight division fighting. Does a 6'2" 205 lbs UFC vet easily take out a 6'5" 280lbs fight coreographer in good shape? He should, but his chances just dropped a little.
UFC ALL THE WAY.
2007-02-06 11:50:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by StoneworkiN 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Like I stated in a prior submit TNA shouldn't additionally be regarded as a comparision to WWE!!!! Wait till they get 2 hrs. and then verify it out for the in basic terms the superb option consequence!!! analysis of TNA now: TNA is a corporation that became into outfitted from the backside and try to get to the best!!! Which i think of might desire to take place in some yrs!!! To WWE followers i do no longer propose they'll dominate WWE yet they have no longer something to lose, WWE on the different hand has each little thing to lose!!!! additionally like I stated on a prior submit UFC should not be reported in this section!!! MMA and Wrestling are 2 countless issues, for this reason won't be able to be in comparison!!! WWE nicely i do no longer could make it easier to be attentive to what you already be attentive to approximately WWE or could I say WWF!!!! WWE besides the incontrovertible fact that it is the biggest promoting yet, additionally has its flaws at cases!!! So my very final analysis on all 3 are: UFC could stay in the MMA section!!! what's using having MMA section in the event that they'll come right here!!!! TNA won't be able to be whilst in comparison with WWE yet till they have reached a fanbase nationally and the international over!!!! which may be completed in some yrs!!! WWE is the biggest promoting the superb option now so, WWE followers shouldn't argue, relatively everyone already is familiar with this!!!!
2016-10-01 13:11:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some of the bigger wrestlers in the WWE might be able to take a lot of the heavy weights in UFC. Tim Sylvia is 6ft 8in at 265lb, and not got much skill and really only won Jeff Monson(5'9" 240lbs) because he was just to big for him to move on the ground when he had his arms spread eagle.But I think the Big Show(Paul Wight 7ft 0in 507lb) could do some serious damage, or Undertaker(Mark William Calaway 6ft 8in 285lb), Kain(Glen Thomas Jacobs 6ft 9in 290lb), the Great Khali(Dalip Singh 7 ft 3 in 420lb) I think could win in the octagon, especially with striking training. Mirko "Cro Cop" Filipović(6ft 2in 220lbs) kicks would hurt'em possibly take out their leg so they'ed have to forfeit but I dout he could reach their heads. And wrestling is fake, but they are still coordinated athletes and spend a lot of time practicing their timing. the majority of UFC fighters woulndn't even be in their weight class. Jacob C. "Tito" Ortiz(6ft 2in 205 lb) would have a hell of a time with Triple H(Paul Michael Levesque6 ft 4 in 265 lb) but I wouldn't be suprised if he could take him with a strike. But I don't think there's a UFC fighter that could beat Big Show if they got in his arms, he could literally crush most of them with his shear body weight. Some of them wouldn't even be able to bench the weight difference.
2007-02-09 13:29:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey what do you think of course a UFC fighter would beat a wwe superstar for ex. John Cena vs Tito Ortiz Tito will beat him so bad
2007-02-06 11:32:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigmatrixmaster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yah but tripple hhh has the time put in hes been wrestling for a long time! Tito oritz isnt that young himself! It woudl be one hell of a battle but remember when everyone thought john cena couldn't take on nearly all the people he did??? Oh hes kicked some serious ****! Maybe being young has something to do with it but i think its just good proper training and workout!
Oh and cena would so kick titos ****! No doubt!
So you mean to tell me that getting hit with a sledge hammer is fake? Lmao i was in the blood zone when i seen them in person and i heard the crack you are all sadly mistaken! Yes wwe is predetermined BUT there is lots of real injury in it also! LMAO
2007-02-06 11:31:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A black & white answer is that UFC would kick *** but it would depend on the individual. Some WWE people would have to be able to hold their own in the real thing.
2007-02-06 12:00:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
UFC would win cuz they actually put their bodies on the line and fight for real while WWE is planned and practiced
2007-02-06 11:33:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hulk Kogan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You never know what can happen.Not because one is real does not mean they can one that is not real.Some wrestlers in the wwe have a mixed martial arts background like RVD.Some can go real extreme like mick foley.Some used to do amateur wrestling like Bobby lashley.Also if they were to get in a real life fight like say in a bar who have time to come up with game move.You just lick,box,thumb,grab anything you get and hit them with it and do not even care.
2007-02-06 11:34:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by jamaican babe 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I doubt it. UFC fighters are a lot more talented wrestlers than those in the WWE.
2007-02-06 11:31:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by beth3988 3
·
0⤊
0⤋