Is "gigantic" bigger than "large" and is "enormous" smaller than "huge"

Answer 1

Who can tell...its a strange world...

Answer 2

Gigantic is considered to be very large or benefitting a giant, so I am assuming it is bigger than large by "very large." Huge is a synonym and used in the definition of enormous, so they seem to be the same.

Answer 3

enormous
gigantic
huge
large
All in that order.
Or if I take your Q literally,
Gigantic is bigger than large & Enormous is bigger than huge.

Answer 4

Well just look at it this way: take Spain for example(La Liga): the big clubs are apart of Liga BBVA & the smaller clubs play in Liga Adelante. FC Barcelona is a big football club team & FC Barcelona B is a sub-football club team which is part of the small club. So depending on it's history, trophy wins, money spend on players/stadiums, the positions in the league at the final season, can also tell a difference as well. But players from smaller clubs can also move up to bigger clubs, when they reach their full potential in their primes, make it to the top, & make a name for themselves.

Answer 5

These are really funny answers. I would say Ginormous is the biggest, then gigantic, then enourmous, then huge. BUt then it all depends on someones perception on whatever it is!

Answer 6

i see it as:
large, huge, enormous, gigantic, ginormous.

that's from smallest to biggest in my point of view

Answer 7

(1) Yes
(2) No
Count the number of letters!!

Answer 8

Depends on what you are doing, looking at & from what angle ;)

And yes, size is important.

Answer 9

we had this discustion at the pub last night and the answer is
scaliats

Answer 10

You forgot ginormous and huarge.