When Iraq enters into a full-scale civil war, how many refugees should the US take in?

Question

After all, we did start the whole thing.

Answer 1

it's amazing, the number of people who, one would assume, can actually read and still think that we are in iraq because of terrorists-shoot, bush INVITED them in! "bring it on!"-i wonder how many americans are in the ground because of THAT phrase? folks, the iraqi civil war has been going on for some time now...haven't you noticed? the iraqi people sure have...as for the question of refugees...of the hundreds of thousands who have fled iraq due to OUR war...we have graciously taken in a little more than 500...don't expect that number to go much higher...especially with a 'compassionate conservative' president

Answer 2

EXCELLENT question! I don't have the answer, but it's something that will likely happen just as it did at the end of the Vietnam War.

Hmmm, I wonder if this issue was part of the post-war planning?

Nahhhhhhhhhh.

Answer 3

We started the liberation, but I'd still blame the people who were oppressing them. Would it pain you to blame the terrorists now?

What is your definition of a civil war? And what makes you think we'd need to take any refugees, thousands of miles away?

Or are you just asking this to undercut your nation's war effort?

Answer 4

During our civil war how many did they take? Check your history and see who set up Iraq after world war II. They are the ones that set up the civil war.

Answer 5

Lets see, we have Saudi, Syria, Lebanon, Qatar, UAE, Oman, Egypt, Kuwait, and Iran. Charity begins at home right?

Answer 6

All of them.

Answer 7

that war is a result of terrorism. Period. Zero to your question, we already have to many muslims

Answer 8

none, but we should tell UN to go in and peace it up