That Khali lost to the Undertaker and had a shorter winning streak than Umaga I mean come on! Khali would never lose in REAL life to anyone in wrestling. But any UFC fighter would destroy him and any other wrestler. But come on dont you think that is Cheesy Scripting for WWE right there.
2007-02-06 10:51:50 · 16 answers · asked by C02 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
GIVE ME A REASON WHY IT ISNT CHEESY!
2007-02-06 10:56:21 · update #1
TELL ME WHY IT ISNT CHEESY GOD!
OH AND ALL YOU PEOPLE THAT SAY NO OBVIOUSLY LIKE TAKER!
2007-02-06 10:59:10 · update #2
JM are you mental god you must be stupid angle and benoit have too much experience in wrestling sorry. Man but yeah anyone can take down Ortiz all you have to do is tackle the guy. But in REAL life Ortiz would KO any wrestler in the WWE
2007-02-06 11:23:19 · update #3
WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO SAY INSTEAD OF CHEESY? WEIRD GAY NO I LIKE THE WORD CHEESY AND I DONT CARE WHAT OTHER PEOPLE SAY
USA USA USA LAST TIME I CHECKED THAT WAS THE COUNTRY I WAS IN
2007-02-06 11:48:49 · update #4
WHAT!!! the undertaker beat khali.i mean under taker is way shorter than him
2007-02-06 10:55:25 · answer #1 · answered by I luv batista 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First of all dude, wrestling is not fighting. It is an art form. It is being able to step in the ring with a guy and tell a story. Your favorite, Khali, sux at doing that. I also hate how you say that no wrestler could beat Khali, but a UFC fighter could. I think you forgot about Kurt Angle or Chris Benoit. Those guys are great mat wrestlers and could take Khali or Tito Ortiz down in a second.
2007-02-06 11:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by jm42445 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not cheesy. Taker's been around too long to drop to a guy like Khali. Hello, anyone remember Giant Gonzales. Back then, people thought he could destroy taker as well and that didn't happen either. Size doesn't mean everything.
2007-02-10 08:44:39 · answer #3 · answered by Rated RKO 4 Life 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's new... WWE always have cheesy scripting. Look at the Rosie Odonnell/Donald Trump match, although I have to admit Donald Trump actually being on raw for real last week was great (so was the money drop). WWE is known for it's cheesy scriping... lol.
2007-02-06 10:56:29 · answer #4 · answered by beth3988 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Come on, dude. Just because you've grown up, doesn't mean they can stop garnering their programming towards children. WE KNOW how it would really go down, but WWE isn't about how things would REALLY go down. It's enjoyable theater on a grand scale. UFC may have reality, but because of that, they've set-up matches as ground-breaking, and memorable, but it can TRULY suck(UFC 61). However, Vince can MAKE things epic, instead of hoping it's epic. So don't compare, enjoy!
2007-02-06 11:09:19 · answer #5 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude no one says cheesy no more catch up wit the times man
2007-02-06 11:44:45 · answer #6 · answered by bigmatrixmaster 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know that you sound crazy? I don't know if it's cheesy. That was too much stuff to read. Do you think it's cheesy.
2007-02-10 06:54:03 · answer #7 · answered by Queen of Everything 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should make the blood fake but the fighting real
2007-02-06 10:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by Emilce 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will all of you teeny boppers please get through your heads that Khali has ZERO TALENT!!!!Umaga is actually a decent wrestler.
2007-02-06 11:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
wwe is known for cheesy scripting its been that way for yrs...and i dont think its gonna stop any time soon and in my opinion i hope it dont thats wat entertains me seeing what is gonna happen next!
2007-02-06 11:22:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋