Even with proper research, its difficult to find as many controversial aspects to a single politician of America's early days. Are people like Bush, Cheney, and those they associate with really that much worse than our country's early elected officials, given that we can link them to such a variety of ethical controversies?
2007-02-06 10:47:32 · 6 answers · asked by Mike G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Nay, only these days they get more publicity. In the past they were much more hidden.
For example when Clinton cheated on his wife he went on trial. When Kennedy cheated, no one knew, and he cheated with more than one lady! Did you know that Marlyn Monroe was not the only one JFK cheated with! Only she was the most famous.
2007-02-06 11:00:10 · answer #1 · answered by Sierra Leone 6 · 9⤊ 0⤋
a lot less stressful pronounced than done. in spite of if the authorities can save remote from people from starving on the streets it truly is plenty better complicated to redistribute wealth. interior the U. S., the properly proper 10% of the inhabitants owns 70% of the criteria. That leaves the something else ninety% of the inhabitants with better or a lot less 30% of the criteria. the hollow between wealthy and detrimental is widening. people artwork better solid for not plenty better funds, the middle form is suffering and larger all and assorted is falling into poverty. There at the instantaneous are not any straightforward, or possibly smart, concepts. interior the Nineteen 1940s, Nineteen Fifties, Nineteen Sixties and area of the Nineteen 1970s, the growing to be monetary gadget benefited all and assorted yet now it truly is now not the case. difficult artwork isn't making the most of the monetary will strengthen. it truly is not any further smart for the authorities to mandate income will strengthen pretty with the captivating opportunities of globalization which resources corporations with better fee-useful difficult artwork.
2016-12-03 19:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who elected these people and shouldn't these elected officials do what the people want, seeing that the only reason they're in power is because of the PEOPLE? But as far as history goes, Only a handful of presidents have had approval ratings in the high 20's or low 30's. And Bush is one of those rare failed leaders.
2007-02-06 11:01:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's just Bush, Cheney, and their associates. I think both political parties need to be purged of career politicians and have new blood brought in. Neither party represents the people, both are beholding to their own set of special interests, and both are more concerned about holding onto their own power than they are about what's good for America.
2007-02-06 10:58:20 · answer #4 · answered by Owlchemy_ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're right, but you rarely get that special breed like Bush who is both bad AND stupid.
2007-02-06 10:52:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is up there with Reagan and Lincoln...those that did what is right and best, even though enormously unpopular.
2007-02-06 10:52:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋