Is a country justified in waging war with other nations, if their own nation is at war with itself ?

Question

According to the standard of human civilization, known as Vedic culture, if one King saw that another King was killing cows in his kingdom, what to speak of abortions, facilitating intoxication as an industry,gambling, and pornography, this was the criteria to attack another nation for being guilty of not protecting it's citizens, including the animals. America's economy is in large part based on exploitation(oil,mining, deforestation, production of armaments) slaughterhouses,liquor,tobacco, gambling & pornography sales. Can they point the finger calling others "terrorists",when their economy is based on barbaric, sub-human activities? It is said that when Alexander the Great arrested a common thief, the thief told Alexander, "What is the
difference between us? I am a small plunderer,and you are a great plunderer." Being very honest, Alexander released him, saying, "Yes, there is no difference." With 12,658 murders in 2006 in the US, is this not enough of a "war" to spend taxes on ?

Answer 1

No. As long as wholesale animal slaughter is permitted to go on by our government for the mere satisfaction of our tongue (palate) we must bear the immense negative consequences. The material world is itself a place always full of anxieties, and by encouraging animal slaughter the whole atmosphere becomes polluted more and more by war, pestilence, famine and many other unwanted calamities. People in general are under the mistaken impression that animals do not feel pain, while being cut to pieces on the chopping block alive! These very same people that are tightly bound up by the mode of ignorance must accept the brunt of receiving a similar reaction. That is the law of karma. The animal killers do not know that in the future the animal will have a body suitable to kill them. That is the law of nature. In human society, if one kills a man he has to be hanged. That is the law of the state. Because of ignorance, people do not perceive that there is a complete state controlled by the Supreme Lord. Every living creature is a son or daughter of the Supreme Lord, and He does not tolerate even an ant's being killed. One has to pay for it. So indulgence in animal killing for the taste of the tongue is the grossest kind of ignorance. A human being has no need to kill animals, because God has supplied so many nice palatable foodstuffs. If one indulges in meat-eating anyway, it is to be understood that he is acting in dire ignorance and is making his future very dark. Of all kinds of animal killing, the killing of cows is most vicious because the cow gives us all kinds of pleasure by supplying milk. Cow slaughter is an act of the grossest type of ignorance. Hence a country populated with 95% meat eaters must suffer severely, sooner or later. There is simply no escaping.

Answer 2

No, a country is not justified in waging war upon another nation when there is so much degradation going on within the country itself. There is too much slaughter of innocent animals, drug use, prostitution, child pornography, gambling and hoarding of funds by the primary leaders of this nation. Going to war against another country is not the answer. The leaders should clean up their own backyard and stop wasting tax payers hard-earned money on arms and missles which will be used for killing innocent women and children.

Answer 3

I reckon sometimes war is justified. I think the world wars were. I don't think the current Iraq thing is.... it is certianly not for the reasons given by the americans.... it's obviously all about oil and world domination. weapons of mass destruction? it is so obvious that they blew up their own world trade center killing thousands of innocent people to justify their wars.... america is ****** up. I'm glad I don't live there. killing animals and eating meat is wrong, on moral, religious, economic, and environmental princapls... if there were a real threat to honest civilization, and that were the reason, i.e. in self defence, then war may be justified. most wars are for self serving reason, but I think if it were truely justifyed, then being not a perfect society at home should not be a reason not to go to war. war is not good for people and children and pets.

Answer 4

i'm questioning an similar ingredient. yet when we do not strive against lower back, they win, and see you later as we are dwelling, we pick to stay properly. i wager. that is demanding to strive against human nature. that is like countless the solutions I were given to my question on right here, Christ is only a convenience to maximum. Plus, he does say he includes convey conflict, no longer peace. It does say in Sirach that in case you pick to get in the route of god, b prepared for testing. And the unifying scripture passage for it truly is someplace in OT, the position God says he' a jealous God. some thing can b justified through the fellow doing the ill. certain, following the state is having a 2d draw close(in case you do it blindly) The flag isn't one of those idolatry, that is only a form. you're able to not worship it. you try your ideal no longer to b a hypocrite. yet in case you cant, only b the perfect darn mendacity manipulator you may b.

Answer 5

get a life iraq was not self defense, not related to 911 or related to osama. it was done

FOR OIL ONLY

http://ca.blog.360.yahoo.com/antiwar_girl