English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Also, who's seen an inconvenient truth?

2007-02-06 10:23:13 · 9 answers · asked by Jake 2 in Politics & Government Elections

9 answers

No way. He had his chance, and he failed.

2007-02-06 15:30:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

To be honest, if the polls and votes had not been messed with a few times, he would have been president so he deserves a chance. Imagine an America that never saw a Bush, EVER! The mind boggles at the thought, doesn't it?

He is proving to everyone that he truly cares about the environment and I think he might be the force to help urge the rest of the world to clean up their act. Because by then, he MIGHT have begun to get America on the right environmental track.

Great film. Terrifying.

2007-02-06 13:51:23 · answer #2 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 1 0

I have not seen an inconvenient truth. Al Gore is superior to any candidates running at this time, yes he should run.

2007-02-06 12:31:09 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 2 0

He had 8 years as vice chairman an did not something. I doubt he will do much better effective as President. not planning on seeing his action picture. I do renowned that if we do not change the economics of Renewable potential, we may be able to anticipate the commercial gadget of 1850 via 2050. This reality is in preserving with better are going to the properly as we are not replacing with new discoveries of oil as we are ingesting them. I also question the quantity of resources which will be accessible because the toddler-boomers retire. those 2 factors will collide very quickly.

2016-12-03 19:51:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't know if he will run, but I've sure been doing a lot of praying that he will!

Run Al, Run.

Maybe he ought to get the electoral college fixed first though!

2007-02-06 13:43:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would vote for him, no I didn't see "An Inconvenient Truth" yet, but plan too. I think he has "loosened up" alot and has gained charisma and popularity. He has the credentials but I am not sure he is interested in a White House bid.

2007-02-06 10:33:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I SAW AN INCONVIENT TRUTH AND IT REALLY PUT THE WHOLE THING ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING IN PERSPECTIVE AND HOW SERIOUS IT IS . I WOULD VOTE FOR HIM IF HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT. AFTER ALL, HE DID WIN IN 2000.

2007-02-06 14:00:11 · answer #7 · answered by MASTERMIKE2004 2 · 1 0

I haven'y & won't. When I want to learn science, I prefer to learn from a scientist. I don't care if he runs. If he does, I doubt anyone will even notice.

2007-02-06 11:58:23 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

if he does maybe this time he will win his own state

2007-02-06 17:05:22 · answer #9 · answered by Michael B 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers