I'd have to say Vick... because he could play mulit positions. He has a arm and he can run the ball.
2007-02-06 10:16:02 · 30 answers · asked by Hack-O-Shaq 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Terry Bradshaw. Even though he couldn't play "mulit positions."
2007-02-06 10:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by aleksa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pe(not a)yton Manning- Finally got the Superbowl ring but still has a history of struggling in the playoffs.
Joe Montana- He would be my choice. He has the ultimate playoff history and no one else is better under pressure.
John Elway- Very spirited player but took him a very long time to win a Superbowl. Without him the Broncos would never be a notable franchise.
Dan Marino- Excellent during regular season but couldn't win a championship.
Michael Vick- The worst quarterback on this list. Who cares if he can play multiple positions? Who cares if he has a great arm and can run the ball? He is a lousy team leader and does not take the game seriously. He was a novelty when he first started but now he is getting old and it's time Atlanta went another direction.
Jim McMahon- Not really the leader of the 85 Bears, but he had the right attitude.
Tom Brady- Great under pressure, great leader, and has 3 Superbowls.
2007-02-06 10:39:14 · answer #2 · answered by jjc92787 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!
Dude you have a lot, and I mean a LOT to learn about football.
The fact that you put McMahon and Vick in the same sentence with those other QB's shows you don't know much. The fact that you picked Michael Vick shows you don't know anything.
How about this list instead.
Montana, Marino, Unitas, Tarkenton, Elway, Brady, Peyton Manning, Favre and Steve Young.
Until somebody break his records my nod will always go to Marino. All those other QB's, at one time ot another played with a pro bowl RB. Marino NEVER had a decent RB in his backfield, nor did he have a good defense.
2007-02-07 03:12:56 · answer #3 · answered by bad_dog76 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you just listed some of the greatest QBs to ever play the game, minus jim mcmahon and michael vick.
Joe Montana is the best
then in no order, marino, brady, elway, manning
2007-02-06 10:26:27 · answer #4 · answered by immisterkevin 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Montana is the better QB. This is QB not ATHLETE. There is a difference. To even try to put Vick in the same class as Montana, Marino, Brady, and Manning is a JOKE. He has no accuracy in general.
2007-02-06 10:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummmm are you crazy? Vick is only better than Jim McMahon on that list. Have you seen his completion percentage? YIKES
I go with Montana as the best from that list and it'd be hard to go with anyone else. Brady and Manning would be neck and neck for second place with Elway, then Marino (only because of his lack of a ring).
To say Vick is the best from this list is just plain wrong and there is nothing besides his running ability that you can use to back up your opinion...
2007-02-06 10:21:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
First off, how could you throw Vicks name in with all these greats. But i would say that John Elway is the eliet QB of this group followed by Joe Montana.
2007-02-06 10:20:24 · answer #7 · answered by eshamn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vick! Dude please tell me your kidding? I'll go ahead and say that not only is it an embarrasment for the other guys on this lst for him to be there, he's probably the most overrated QB to ever play the game. Athlete definatley, NFL QB never. I'm gonna say Montana and Brady fight for number 1 because they might not be the most athletic but they win when it counts...period. Vick will never do that. But to say that Manning isn't great is insane. 2 time Reg season MVP, Single season passer rating record, single season TD passes record, SB MVP, 7 straight 4,000 yrd seasons. What do you want him to do? Break Bruce Smith's sack record?
2007-02-10 06:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by JuJU 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick because he does anything to win. He has an impressive career win loss record despite not having that good an offensive line (run blocking is different from pass blocking) and no real deep threat at receiver. Peyton Manning (as you can see from the super bowl) has a BEAUTIFUL offensive line, he was barely touched the whole game, and receivers, Harrison, Wayne, Clark, need I say more. Let Michael have that kind of talent around him, can you say dynasty?
2007-02-06 11:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by khrpr34 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Payton's name doesn't belong up there. The competition is Joe, John, and Dan. Yea Vick is good, but the others are better. I would say a tie between Joe, John, and Dan.
2007-02-06 12:45:30 · answer #10 · answered by Kasey B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elway. He can throw the ball, run when its necessary, and he has 2 rings. I'd say itd be brady second (hes won with fewer weapons than the next guy), Montana, marino, manning, mcmahon, and finally vick.
2007-02-06 10:32:29 · answer #11 · answered by JK 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋