Maybe she has stock in the solar,wind and electric power industies
2007-02-06 10:15:30 · 8 answers · asked by shawnn 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's not it. It's because she is a socialist, plain and simple. Socialist love to "redistribute" wealth. Now don't get me wrong, I think that the oil companies have made way to much off the American people over the past couple of years, with their record profits and all. But if we pay it they may as well make it.
We live in a capitalist system. With that comes rich and poor. But if you work hard, and apply yourself, you too can become rich. Socialist hate that. And I believe that's what she is.
2007-02-06 10:22:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
regrettably, there is not any longer something unlawful if congress votes it into regulation. It befell in the 70's. it could take place lower back. it relatively is a handy political gadget accountable the oil companies for client and baby-kisser failings. enable's blame somebody else. united statesnationwide interest. regrettably, Hillary isn't too smart. Neither became into her husband. yet they're the two so a lot extra smart than Georgy boy. i assume it relatively is an American incidence to have somebody in the White homestead who makes the well-known citizen look like a Rhodes pupil.
2016-10-01 13:05:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say go after all the other companies that made record profits. Toyota posted record profits, Insurance posted record profits, Pharmaceuticals posted record profits. Lets just nationalize everything like Russia and Bolivia did and ........oh wait they collapsed because of it...
2007-02-06 10:26:46 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. the clintons must have investments in those companies. The clintons only do what benefits them monetarily.
2007-02-06 10:21:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's actually a good idea, I believe. Though that doesn't make her look any more appetizing as a candidate, in my opinion. I still will not vote for her in either the Primary or General Election.
2007-02-06 10:20:13 · answer #5 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because she is a socialist and a statist.
2007-02-06 10:22:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because she thinks she can do whatever she wants with other people's money.
2007-02-06 10:20:16 · answer #7 · answered by wesbenterprise 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
money, money, money
2007-02-06 10:20:04 · answer #8 · answered by sunflare63 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋