generals
bush sr freinds
democrats
voters
muslims
united nations
scientist
casue hes the decider he can do WAHT HE PLEASES hell no
IMPEACH
2007-02-06 09:59:20 · 18 answers · asked by Republicans tjhink bush nevr lie 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
all other options will not generate money for him and his buddies.
2007-02-06 10:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Honestly? I have no clue.
Impeachment is not an option, however, as that would only burden the economy farther, and deprive the Democrats of their sealed ascendancy to the Presidency and possibly expanded control of Congress in '08. Also, what would happen if after the impeachment, the new President proved more popular? Or, another scenario: What if Pelosi became President? It would ruin Hillary's chance at the White House, because Madame President would obviously run for election... See the predicament?
2007-02-06 10:11:07 · answer #2 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He did listen to all of them. He put all their ideas together and came up with the best conclusion to winning this thing. That's what the president does. No one person is going to make a decision that will please everyone. He is doing what he thinks is neccessary to win this conflict. Whether we like it or not, he has made a decision and is sticking by his decision. All we can do now is hope it works and we can get our soldiers out of there and leave Iraq in stable condition. I'm not for this war, but I am for the cause. And I sure as hell don't want to have to go back in the next 10 years to try and clean up what we should have done this time.
2007-02-06 10:08:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He cannot admit he is wrong or even that he has made a mistake. And many republicans are wrapped up in that type of ego also cant admit mistakes. And a complete minulpulater of the truth .Sure all polititions do it but not the the extent that this adminastration has WOW So he is a lier to boot.
It takes a big man or women to admit that they have made a mistake and i must say it is embarrising now to have a man that is the so called leader of the strongest country in the world who cant say well i think i goofed. Now any admission of mistakes, and we will all know it, is just because he was pushed into it so it will not be genuine.
I was taught that if 2 or 3 people tell me im really messing up I gotta look at it and change it. Because im a man that will admit mistakes Bush never. I say IMPEACH also
2007-02-06 10:09:14 · answer #4 · answered by bone g 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
"Refuse to listen" is the same as "disagree"? Wow, you need a new dictionary, Sparky!
Lots of generals agree with GWB. Lots of Democrats want to win the next election more than they want to win the war on terror. Lots of voters voted for GWB, so you're wrong there for sure. Unless you're talking about polling, where we never see the question, and we assume we know what the poll results mean. "Do you approve ..." "no, I wish he would send LOTS more troops and kill LOTS more of the enemy." that's disapproval in the polls, LOL. Lots of Muslims are the enemy, do you want Bush to listen to them?? The UN is useless, corrupt, and dominated by dictatorships.
Sticking to one's principles is not an impeachable offense.
LOL
2007-02-06 10:20:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He has stated over and again that he's listened to various opinions, and I see no reason to disbelieve him. We may not agree with his choices, but that's a different thing altogether. Also, I see little difference between his saying he's the decider and Mr. Truman's "The Buck Stops Here" sign. Calm down. You'll make your point more effectively if you're a bit less hysterical.
2007-02-06 10:06:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
From the very beginning, way back when he was appointed he didn't listen only to what he wanted to hear. What makes you think that he will listen to anybody now. I think this time there is an ulterial motive to his action, he is building up to attack Iran, and get ready to pay over 4 a gallon for gas.
2007-02-06 10:05:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
He does listen to them and runs them by his advisers that he trusts. If they are not viable he doesn't use them. As any real leader would do. You mention the united nations, how funny you would consider them a credible source for anything.
2007-02-06 10:08:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
President Bush has no control over the situation and is a puppet. The government decides for him. If he was a Democrat, it wouldn't matter either. If Bill Clinton were still president, he'd be a puppet too.
I'm not liberal, because I know that there is a war going on in the environment and there are too many people with psychological issues and bad habits, that are hard to control due to ignorance , anger, hatred, deception, and overpopulation.
Bush isn't the one to blame, we should IMPEACH ourselves, because there is not enough LOVE in this world.
2007-02-06 10:02:01 · answer #9 · answered by Agent319.007 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Ready Moby Dick. Captain Ahab refused to listen to the crew. Of course he was eaten by the whale. Both are obsessed and delusional.
2007-02-06 10:06:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
he and he alone is the decider. who cares what they say. who cares that 70% of the country wants us out of Iraq who cares that the world sees us as fools and elitists GEORGE BUSH WILL DECIDE THEM OUT OF EXISTENCE DECIDE FOR US GEORGE .by the way which tie will go better with this shirt Mr decider i need your help
2007-02-06 10:05:26 · answer #11 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋