English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who thinks that wrestlemania is way better than the superbowl in every way? The superbowl is OVERRATED. the games never live up to the hype. If wrestlemania was on regular tv than it would destroy the superbowl in ratings every year. who's with me?the superbowl sucks.

2007-02-06 08:58:19 · 18 answers · asked by BOB 6 in Sports Wrestling

18 answers

You're kidding me right? I love wrestling but it would NEVER EVER defeat the Super Bowl in ratings. Do you realize that every year, the Super Bowl is either the #1 or #2 watched program of THE YEAR? People who don't even watch football watch the Super Bowl, whether it's for commercials, the halftime entertainment, or for gambling purposes.

Did you know that this year's Super Bowl was the third most watched show in television history behind the Cowboys/Steelers Super Bowl in 1996 and the finale of MASH!! So, NO, no way does WrestleMania ever beat the Super Bowl.

2007-02-07 02:46:54 · answer #1 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0 0

The Superbowl is an American tradition that Wrestlmania could not compete with. Yes while Wrestlamania is a great show, not enough of Americans watch wrestling for it to overpower the Superbowl. Compare the ratings of Raw and or Nitro to the Monday night football games and this is already a fact.

2007-02-06 09:05:56 · answer #2 · answered by topdawgco97 4 · 1 1

The superbowl would win in ratings but wrestlemania is better in every way. Football is the most boring sport ever next to Nascar racing.

2007-02-06 09:34:58 · answer #3 · answered by Lying from you 4 · 1 0

Wresllemania for sure. If you look at the crowd for the Superbowl's game, it is a bunch of corporate clowns who got free tickets and try to be cool but aren't. Wrestlemania is all wrestling fans. With the superbowl there are no guarantees that it will be good but Wrestlemania is ALWAYS good. Just look at this year's, Undertaker and HBK can win championships.

2007-02-06 09:07:53 · answer #4 · answered by Pokerdude 1 · 1 1

Jeff Hardy > Super Bowl & Wrestlemania. No But Super Bowl.

2016-05-24 00:41:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it would but you have to think that even though man kind loves the seen of two barbarians beating the living crap out of each other is kind of tiring. And the Superbowl provides certain twists to that of Wrestle-mania. Not saying I don't think it would topple the ratings cause in actuality it WOULD!

2007-02-06 12:21:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WrestleMania!

2007-02-09 02:42:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ur too right, people think just because wrestling's fake it makes a difference i would watch wrestlemania over 'superbowl' any day! if wrestlemania was free it would probably be bigger than superbowl

2007-02-06 09:11:48 · answer #8 · answered by Tootie B 1 · 1 1

That's funny.

Pro wrestling is on Monday night every week, oh wait, unless there is a freaking DOG SHOW. Then they change the time to let people watch DOGS walk around in a circle.

If Pro wrestling could draw that kind of viewers, it would be on commercial TV, instead of SCI-FI.

2007-02-06 09:28:29 · answer #9 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 1 1

It would be hard to get the same amount of hype built up about an event of which the outcomes are predetermined, and will have no lasting effect on anything but the WWE. I hate to be the one to burst your bubble, but wrestling is scripted. Those personalities you see on RAW and Smackdown are just Characters, just roles played by actors. Albeit physically gifted actors, but actors nonetheless

2007-02-06 09:03:36 · answer #10 · answered by Michael L 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers