The first answer is off-base, There is actually more heat capacity per unit weight for higher molecular hydrocarbons.
I agree with the second answer, typically there is more branching and more functional groups (like acids, thionyl group & amines) and even elemental contamination as you go up in molecular weight. So you get incomplete combustion and acid gases and metallic pollution. The low molecular weight alkanes “unzip” (cleaving off the terminal carbon) quite cleanly.
Also think about handling, as you get to higher molecular weights viscosity goes up and percent solids goes up. Even though you might be able to pump a liquid fraction, there would be a build up of high molecular weight gunk in distribution tanks and lines and your vehicle’s fuel system. Smaller molecules are always cleaner.
Of course the engines would have to be redesigned to work with specific molecular weights and fuel types, much like methane, propane, gasoline and diesel engines are today.
As a fuel high molecular weight materials work fine, heck look at space Ship One. They use a solid hydrocarbon fuel that has the consistency of rubber.
2007-02-06 08:58:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by James H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
With every day pass, our country is getting into more and more trouble. The inflation, unemployment and falling value of dollar are the main concern for our Government but authorities are just sleeping, they don’t want to face the fact. Media is also involve in it, they are force to stop showing the real economic situation to the people. I start getting more concern about my future as well as my family after watching the response of our Government for the people that affected by hurricane Katrina.
According to recent studies made by World Bank, the coming crisis will be far worse than initially predicted. So if you're already preparing for the crisis (or haven't started yet) make sure you watch this video at http://www.familysurvival.tv and discover the 4 BIG issues you'll have to deal with when the crisis hits, and how to solve them fast (before the disaster strikes your town!) without spending $1,000s on overrated items and useless survival books.
2014-09-25 18:51:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are unsuitable because upon ignition, there isnt enough viable energy released to be used as a efficient fuel. I mean, would you want to pump 25 gallons of tar to get the equivalent energy of about 1 liter of gasoline (octanes, heptanes, and a few other components).
2007-02-06 16:33:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phillip R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
'Bunker C' is a heavy fraction of crude oil consisting of 'Topped Crude' which is crude oil having had much of the lighter fractions removed.
Bunker 'C' is a heavy fuel oil used in furnaces in refineries and boilers in steam raising equipment in ships .. etc.
2007-02-06 16:49:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Norrie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
for many reasons, but mainly because they cause more pollution
2007-02-06 16:34:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by jav_7792 2
·
0⤊
1⤋