http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=wilson
2007-02-06 08:24:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
you people are heartless, absolutly heartless. Think if it was your child.. And sit there and act like you dont have skeletons in your closet!
2007-02-06 08:57:56 · update #1
That's so wrong! They were both underage and they both agreed to it. He didn't rape her. She wanted to do it. That law should be abolished! This is so unfair. The girl admited she let him do it. It's not like 18 year old with a 15 year old. Theyre both children. I pity him. It shouldn't be like this.
2007-02-06 10:12:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because a 15 year old is too young to consent. He was old enough to know better. He committed a crime.
Maybe 10 years is a long sentence when there was only 2 years age difference. That doesn't mean he didn't commit a crime.
2007-02-06 16:49:16 · answer #2 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As far as I'm concerned the guy did not commit a crime. He was 17! There is only a two year difference. Any American who believes this guy commit ed a crime, obviously doesn't care about freedom.
2007-02-09 06:21:19 · answer #3 · answered by Live life. 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They did change the law but in Georgia I guess they're too backward and conservative to review such a harsh sentence.
2007-02-06 17:51:42 · answer #4 · answered by Raven 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because some of our laws are antiquities -- that is why. the law in that state --states so -- and the 17 yr. old male did not know. of course he realizes now that it was not worth it. hope it helps. case closed for us. hope they change the law.
2007-02-06 16:36:54 · answer #5 · answered by s t 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because she was underage, and it technically means he's a paedophile.
2007-02-06 16:29:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋