who thinks undertaker should of done a bit better in wrestling?

Question

Well i think he should because look at his 14.0 winning streak.He never really got real challenges like at 2006 wm,he took on mark henry.For pitty sake that will never make the undertaker look cool it will just make his streak last longer.If you look at his carrer he never got real title shots and he never had big challenges.All he had was rivales with giants like kane,kamala,giant gonzales.He always had people helping him in his title shot like at wrestlemania 17 when he v psyco sid for the title it was ment for him to win it with no help but bret came in and made undertaker win.Taker really should of got a push in the wwf/wwe

Answer 1

I think the reason they did this with the Taker was because he never needed a belt to get over with the fans. Vince tries to make stars by putting them up against the Taker. As for the Mark Henry match, remember Henry was getting a huge push then (mainly because they were stupid and signed him to some ridicules contract that they can't get out of). And to say he never got any good rivalries is wrong, Hogan, Yoko, Mankind, Bret Hart, HBK, remember the Crucifixion of Austin ( http://www.obsessedwithwrestling.com/pictures/s/steveaustin/28.jpg )

Answer 2

Undertaker isn't to blame for lame big men in the ring. He's one of the more agile big men in pro wrestling. Don't hate on taker, he's doing the best he can with a bad lot for opponents.

Answer 3

It's all up to Vince......