injunctive relief
n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction. Such an act is the use of judicial (court) authority to handle a problem, and is not a judgment for money. Whether the relief will be granted is usually argued by both sides in a hearing rather than in a full-scale trial, although sometimes it is part of a lawsuit for damages and/or contract performance. Historically, the power to grant injunctive relief stems from English equity courts rather than damages from law courts. (See: injunction, writ, equity, permanent injunction)
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
small claims court
n. a division of most municipal, city or other lowest local courts which hear cases involving relatively small amounts of money and without a request for court orders like eviction. The highest (jurisdictional) amount that can be considered in small claims court varies by state, but goes as high as $5,000 in California. In small claims court, attorneys may not represent clients, the filing fee is low, there is no jury, the procedure is fairly informal, each side has a short time to present his/her case and the right to appeal only permits a trial de novo (a new trial) at the next court level. Often the judge is an experienced lawyer sitting as a pro tem judge. Small claims court is a quick, inexpensive way to settle lesser legal disputes, although the controversies are often important to the participants. The well-known television program People's Court is intended to be a good example of a small claims court.
The People's Law Dictionary by Gerald and Kathleen Hill Publisher
By these definitions, small claims courts do not offer injuctive relief, only award dollar damages.
2007-02-07 20:48:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it really is not an computerized win. The decide will nonetheless pay interest to at least one part of the tale and decide if there's a valid case. data is needed. ought to fraud take position? probably, yet now unlikely. you even ought to educate that the different man or woman knew about the lawsuit. The courtroom contraptions the date, not the guy suing. If Bob can not ensue, he can make a action to regulate the date of the tournament, if he has solid reason. taking on Walmart is a fool's flow. they could probable report a flow criticism antagonistic to Fred. mendacity in courtroom is a criminal offense and Fred can finally end up in detention middle. extremely if it takes position on a daily foundation. Katy, not each state calls for conflict decision previous to going to small claims.
2016-12-03 19:39:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by nastasi 4
·
0⤊
0⤋