What do you guys think he could be a back up for Romo you know I think it's a good idea.
2007-02-06 07:28:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
TRADE GROSSMAN FOR A WATERBOY
2007-02-06 07:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by this_takes_awhile 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Grossman is not a good QB when are people going to understand. This is the first year he has played a whole season. The D gave the Bears those wins not Grossman. 143 points scored from turnovers. Come on if Grossman does not get canned I think he will be shot in Chicago haha. Hes going to end up like Tim Couch. He has no future in the NFL. The games he did good in he had no pressure on him. And the NFC does not have any powerhouse teams. I think we all realize the only reason the Super Bowl was so close was because of the weather. If they have the chance to get Bledsoe for Grossman Id do it. Have Drew be the man to teach Griese and Ortan or whatever his name is. They should have kept him as the starter last year. Peace out................
2007-02-06 07:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by powerliftingrules 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I think Bledsoe is past his prime. Even though Chicago's line might be able to give Bledsoe the protection that statue needs in the pocket, there's no real upside to Bledsoe over Griese as it is, plus he's only got a few seasons at best left in him.
If the Bears are looking to move Sexy Rexy, Arizona would be a better choice - Kurt Warner has better vision and decision making, he'd be a great fit in Chicago, while Grossman could give a little competition to Leinart to keep him firing on all cylinders in the desert - Grossman would probably look a lot better if he was throwing to Boldin and Fitz, too....
2007-02-06 07:44:07 · answer #3 · answered by droid327 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i might think of approximately choosing up Rex Grossman, yet are you constrained to in basic terms 2 quarterbacks? Why no longer drop somebody else? each so often people shop 2 kickers for all time on the cost of yet another place. Neither Bledsoe or McNair are all that warm, having 3 QBs may be a stable flow in case you're able to do it.
2016-10-01 12:54:01 · answer #4 · answered by missildine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well sense parcells left i wouldnt see any problem with it. Imaging bieng rex grossman with your head coach Bill Parcells. ouch!!!!!!!!. Could bledsoe play better is the question? I mean could he really start for the bears? The bears should really try to get Mike Vick if he decides to leave the falcons. I know it would costs the bears alot of money but could you imagine the team they would have. By the way i hate the bears. Im a Packer Backer
2007-02-06 07:37:01 · answer #5 · answered by Mike Z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be good for the Bears... not as good for the Cowboys I don't think.
Romo should be the starter... Drew should go or start somewhere I suppose... but I doubt Dallas would be willing to pay a starting QB salary for a backup to a second year starting QB.
2007-02-06 07:36:28 · answer #6 · answered by disposable_hero_too 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Grossman would be a good backup anywhere as long as he is not starting
2007-02-06 07:30:23 · answer #7 · answered by patrick s 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He would be a perfect backup. He is o.k. for a starter but it would be nice to know that you have a semi good qb behind your starter. Kind of like Jeff Garcia.
2007-02-06 07:36:14 · answer #8 · answered by Odes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are okay back ups but neither should be a starter.
2007-02-06 07:43:59 · answer #9 · answered by edempsey18 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah, its good idea
Grossman had three int and a touchdown this Sunday's game
2007-02-06 07:33:57 · answer #10 · answered by DXTRCHN11 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋