the reason i ask he made it has a pg but thier r a few pg in the west that r better player than parker. d william baron davis and also paul r better pg than parker.
2007-02-06 07:16:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
No, Deron williams should have made the all star team. He's second in the league in assists on a team that lead his division. Baron and paul arent on playoff teams so thats why I counted them out. Paul also missed alot of games because of his injury.
2007-02-06 08:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by ozzygreen11 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This hard to answer considering that I like Tony Parker and I'm happy he made the All -Star team. However I do think Chris Paul, Deron Williams and Baron Davis are better points guards then him. But despite this, I think he made it because he can be exciting to watch sometimes with the way he penetrates and gets to the basket.
2007-02-06 16:26:06 · answer #2 · answered by roni26 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Parker has helped guide the Spurs to three NBA championships, and he's better at penetrating, and getting to the basket, then ANY other point guard in the league. He's also dishes out his share of assists. I challenge anyone who doesn't think Parker should be on the all-star team to watch him play night in, and night out, for a stretch of 12 straight games, and you'll see why the coaches around the league picked him as a reserve. After Nash, and Iverson, he's without question, the third best point guard in the west. The guy can score anytime he wants, and if he wasn't trying to pass to Duncan, and Ginobili as much as he does, he could easily be one of the leagues top ten scorers. Should Tony Parker be an allstar? Of course, and he is, for the second year in a row.
2007-02-06 15:40:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The point guard spot gets augmented by having a good team, more so than any other position. Assists come easier because better shooters will make more baskets. Similarly as the smallest guy on the floor (generally) and although they can sometimes penetrate and make their own shots; they often need powerhouse players to draw doubleteams so they can drill open jumpers.
The Spurs are one of the best teams in the league still, and Parker benefits from that. I think players like Paul and Davis who don't have as much of a supporting cast are more of your true all stars.
2007-02-06 15:25:32 · answer #4 · answered by last_texans_fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
point guards who are better than tony parker in the west:
Steve Nash
Chris Paul
Jason Terry
Baron Davis
Deron Williams
Mike Bibby
Earl Boykins
2007-02-06 15:24:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
BARON DAVIS IS BETTER. PARKER PLAYS ON A BETTER TEAM AND BANGS A HOT LATIN CHICK.
2007-02-06 15:26:27 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin F 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no. like you say there are more PG that are way better than him.
2007-02-06 15:19:50 · answer #7 · answered by vy0441 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no deron williams is better and so is josh howard and melo
2007-02-06 15:47:30 · answer #8 · answered by rich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, not as much as carmelo how will replace yao or boozer cuz of their injures
2007-02-06 15:23:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2007-02-06 16:39:43 · answer #10 · answered by B Dub 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋