"aboput"? --Hey, you took so little care with your question, it's hard to believe you are serious, or that your question rates a serious answer.
2007-02-06 06:20:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by yahoohoo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The assisination of the Archduke led to the war due to the very pre-established systems of response established in each country. In military science, WWI is a part of The Age of Systems, a period defined by its concentration on the supply and pre-planning military action beginning with Napolean and his concentration on logistics, extending through the writings of the preparation-minded Admiral Bradley Fiske and not at all stopping with the formation of the General Staff as a means of dealing with supply. Heck, in many ways, our nuclear arsenal is in the age of systems, and we're just as afraid of it leading to an unintended war
2007-02-06 14:48:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Armchair Explorer 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, the assassination was the final straw... war had been brewing in Europe for a while.
2007-02-06 15:16:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by pikachu is love. 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's the official version.
Then again, the official version is that the Iran/Iraq war started with the destruction of the world trade center .......
2007-02-06 14:23:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by flywho 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, that's good as an initial cause.
2007-02-06 14:20:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by steve_geo1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
agree...however war was inevitable between the european powers. If it didnt happen then it would have happened very soon
2007-02-06 15:06:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by jefferson 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I think it was because Archie Duke shot an ostrich because he was hungry.....
2007-02-06 14:21:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by the_ref 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
wow flywho so what you are saying is we only know the propaganda of the victor?? i believe you to be correct in your assumption.
2007-02-06 14:40:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Deano™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋