Right wing scare tactic is to paint anyone who disagrees with their right wing flawed ideology as a demon,,yes it is a reflection of lack of originality and the lack mental capacity to think on one’s own with out having FAUX news telling them what to believe.
2007-02-06 05:53:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by JS 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that the right wing is trying to make the liberals look reactionary because they have nothing else to do. It isn't like they can argue that the guy in the white house isn't a real idiot and a screw up. . .
2007-02-06 05:44:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Do you no longer comprehend something approximately technology and our surroundings? there continues to be a hollow in the ozone that varieties over the poles. in the final ? perchance 30 years on account that we became attentive to the issue we've greater extra appropriate chemical compounds to apply as refrigerants, coolants, and have stopped spewing a lot of chloroflurocarbons into the ambience. It seems as though we've acted in time and the hollow is steadily getting slightly smaller. No, we're not making up technology ... we use it to purpose and choose strategies to issues. in many cases our scientific discoveries finally end up inflicting issues, then we would desire to continually artwork to alleviate those issues. we gained't triumph over the earth yet we relatively can impact its floor and its plant/animal populations. i assume you haven't any longer have been given any toddlers and don't plan on having any.
2016-10-01 12:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In recent years they've been fairly reactionary. They had a few items in the recent election but nothing of much substance.
That's my issue with the Dem party-- they can throw stones but have not shown much leadership in recent years.
Those who do have ideas never seem to get press or exposure.
I see more thought leadership and ideas coming out of the grass roots and talk shows than I do from the goofs we elected.
The problem with both the D's and the R's is that they're more worried about holding on to power and their ideology than they are about coming up with rational decisions. The next year and half are going to be next to useless becuase of the elections. We need term limits...
btw-- I'm not happy with repubs either....
2007-02-06 05:41:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yes. And it is not a "scare tactic." It is an observation. And since I made it, I would know. And this question is very reactionary, as well.
The Democrats ran this past election TOTALLY on an anti-Bush platform. They never did put forth ANY platform other than that. If this isn't reactionary, I do not know what is.
2007-02-06 05:56:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
US liberals are tired of the crap being spewed out by the idiotic fundie right. If that is reactionary - so be it, as long as we stop the neobots from trashing our home.
2007-02-06 05:44:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Kwan Kong is a perfect example of how delusional the right wing conservatives are. Even I know that my conservative friends are shaking their heads after reading his statements. Those fanatical ideas usually leads to imprisonment of the Human Spirit and that's how you get the DARK AGES. If being liberal allows me to question everything than I am in good company. In my own opinion, God would encourages us to ask questions and seek out our truths instead of having them dictated to us by fanatics.
2007-02-06 05:55:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Huh? Reactionaries fall far right on the political spectrum. Are they seriously using this now?
2007-02-06 05:46:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The libs are reactionary. They're ones who just react, and have no solutions to any of the problems.
2007-02-06 05:43:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
US liberals are suffering from a mental disorder called Bush Derangement Syndrome. Symptoms include frequent unintelligible blurting out of incoherent phrases at the mere mention of George W. Bush.
2007-02-06 05:42:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋