2007-02-06 05:22:54 · 7 answers · asked by dazrama3 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
The media can be subtle with their homophobic remarks but it still exists. Why is acceptable for media groups and editors to allow this?
2007-02-06 05:41:26 · update #1
Join GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation), a media watch group that praises positive portrayals of the GLBT community and brings to task the negative portrayals.
2007-02-06 05:49:14 · answer #1 · answered by behrmark 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Come on now. When sexuality of straights and gays were in the closet, the world was a better place. We don't need rampant homosexuality and heterosexuality in our media. That belongs at home.
You guys already have Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen. At least Ellen is funny. Rosie is just a bigoted, fat slob that has a chip on her shoulder.
That should be proof right there. Most people like Ellen even if they disagree with her sexuality. Everyone thinks Rosie is a big, pushy, horse's ***.
2007-02-06 13:40:54 · answer #2 · answered by Berzirk 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In the UK we have the Press Complaints Commission. I don't know about the US.
You could write to the Editor, or get a lawyer to on your behalf.
2007-02-06 13:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe contact an anti-defamation group and let the legal battle begin.
2007-02-06 14:05:54 · answer #4 · answered by carora13 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems to me like your complaining already,
I accept everyone, untill they cross me, but I am doing my part, complaining isn't going to change things, only make the worse
2007-02-06 13:27:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Set up an anti-defimation league for gays?
2007-02-06 13:28:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does it matter? Be who or what you want to be, whose business is it but yours?
2007-02-06 13:26:39 · answer #7 · answered by deez145 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋