When did you find out President Bush blew up the World Trade Center?

Question

He is the Commander in Chief...the man in charge. Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?

Answer 1

Bush was most likely involved, but I don't believe he was in charge. My number one suspect in the biggest crime to ever go uninvestigated is the PNAC (project for a new american century). If you read through some of the extensive documents on their website, its clear they have had plans for a war in Iraq for quite some time, they even sent a letter to President Clinton to persuade him to invade Iraq. Members include Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, Bill Kristol, and Condaleeza Rice had some involvement as well. But to answer your question, I was at home sitting on on my *** about a year ago when I found out that the WTC was undoubtedly destroyed by bombs, not planes. I've talked to a lot of people about, and some listen, some don't. I've heard a lot of arguments, like the pancake theory for example. But what blows my mind is the fact that guilt in this case was presumed, never established. We assumed Al-Qaeda was responsible, we assumed Osama Bin Laden was guilty, but years later I have yet to see any rock solid proof of that assumption. And if the governments version of events is true, then why are they hiding everything? Why did Rudy Guiliani order thousands of tons of debris from the World Trade Center shipped to an undisclosed location, where investigators couldn't examine it? Why did Bush drag his feet so long to keep the 9/11 Commission from happening, and then, why was the Commission given so many stipulations when it did finally did happen? I know that none of this proves we were attacked by our own government, but regardless, with all the evidence that's piling up, a new investigation is definitely warranted. The problem is, people don't have the imagination (or the guts) to accept the possibility. As long as no one believes that our government could do something like this, they'll continue to get away with it, and they'll do it again.

Answer 2

Ok Moron

I'll play your stupid game. Explain to me where anyone has said that the steel melted. When a 220,000lb object hits something it tends to bend stuff. Yes even steel. Or at least the steel used in the construction of the towers. You may or may not have played Jenga, but when a support gets damaged or removed, this little thing called gravity (it's not on your periodic table, but you can look it up) forces weight such as entire floors of the building to collapse. Thus a domino effect takes place and eventually, it falls down until something stops it. So plane hits, fuel causes fires in excess of 3000 deg and structure becomes damaged the weight of the plane and concrete fall down causing the next floor to collapse, so forth and so on. If you would spend your time more wisely, you could become the next democratic Senator from Mass.

Answer 3

haha.. ur right.. funny though i think i watched this short documentary on Metacafe tht the plane tht crashed thru. part of the pentagon was acutally a missile becasuse no pieces of aeroplane were found... and if any were actually found they were fabricated coz they were sure as hell too small to come from a B- 747 .. plus i dont remember them mentioning any casualties or finding body parts at the scene of explosion at the pentagon..

P.S. there is no such thing as al-Qaida.. its a freakin made up excuse by the Bush administration to attack iraq.. and dont get me started on the "WMD" oooo ... wonder what they did with the nuclear weapons that would "wipe out humanity".... didnt know AK-47's could do that.. hmmm.. coz thts practically what the bloody crippled iraqi army is armed with compared to guns 'n' tanks the u.s. army
in the infamous words of Mdm. Albright (former sec. of state) after receiving news that 6 million were killed in iraq/afghanistan i quote " it was all worth it" ... this says it ALL.

forgive me if ive me facts a bit off.. but im sure u know where im getting at

Answer 4

Because you are wrong. The structures stood for awhile and the weight eventually cause the buildings to fall. They were not designed to with hold that amount of unsupported weight. As for melting steel? It depends on the make up of the actually alloy. It is possible for it to melt under such conditions and I would beg you to prove that it is not possible.

As for pre-planted explosives? They would have had to detonate upon impact and the explosions showed no sign of secondary explosions.

Answer 5

You're ignorant.

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

Answer 6

I'm going to say the same thing to you that I said to the guy who believes Hilary Clinton was behind 9/11: Get a life.

Answer 7

The biggest problem I have with that theory is "leaks". The Press has received leaks about everything illegal that Bush & Cheney have done. I think someone would have already leaked out something that huge.

Answer 8

We, the critical thinkers, don't believe in everything we see on the internet. We're laughing at all of you who do really think a left-wing-nut video like "Loose Change" is even remotely based in reality.

By the way, this blows all the holes in your theories.
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/

I suppose it's about time for you to run off for your tin foil hat fitting.

Answer 9

People are afraid to see the facts that are too painful to see!

To actually admit to yourself your government could be so evil is difficult for most Americans!

Our current and future administration's crimes and treason will only be understood and accepted when our great grandchildren's great grandchildren read about it in a history book!

We could provide 1000 hrs of evidence and still people cannot for their own peace of mind and sense of righteousness bring themselves to believe it!

Answer 10

He didn't. When will you grow up you little fool? Show me steel on the periodic table? It isn't there, and neither is any of the alleged evidence against Bush you are making up because of your irrational hatred.