Many in both political parties are moving towards a New World Order they just have different ways of getting there!
Nixon-Reagan-GHW Bush-Clinton-GW Bush ALL are involved in this ideology!
We keep attacking the parties and they are BOTH corrupt!!
You need to investigate whether or not someone who is running for office is a New World Order activist not which political party they belong to!
2007-02-06 04:47:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is GHW Bush actually speaking ti the nation about the New World Order!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?tv=_CWBTL33MpA&mode=related&search=
2007-02-06 04:56:05 · update #1
Ooops! I typed it wrong this is the right http
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33MpA&mode=related&search=
2007-02-06 05:02:06 · update #2
I don't know about your claims about them all moving us towards a New World Order but you are exactly right about both parties being the problem. Even if we had a third or fourth party they would also be the problem. It because all most politicians are in it for is the power and they will do anything to obtain and retain it. The countries best interests aren't their priority, just their own selfish greed.
2007-02-06 04:53:58 · answer #1 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that both parties are corrupt. All politics are corrupt, itis thenature of the beast. I do not think that facism is a good word to describe it though.
2007-02-06 12:51:53 · answer #2 · answered by rcbricker33 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt ever. As long as fascism is being defined in two different, completely opposite languages, it isn't going to happen.
Wiki's definition of fascism is, by its own admission, a post-40's definition of fascism. Liberal revisionism at its finest.
My definition of fascism looks like France before Napoleon and Italy before Mussolini.
2007-02-06 13:20:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's been the Republicrats and the Demolicans for years now. They also own all of the mass media.
Good Luck!
2007-02-06 12:56:15 · answer #4 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is both parties. But it is a matter of the lesser of the two evils.
2007-02-06 12:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both parties have become corrupt. We DESPERATELY need a 3rd party. That's why Ralph Nader is so important. He will not win, but its got to start somewhere.
2007-02-06 12:50:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You can not have true fascism without Socialism and weak religious pop.
2007-02-06 13:28:11 · answer #7 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do some research ya damn fool, Ralph Nader is absolutely no answer and is a hypocrite.
2007-02-06 12:51:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What is a "new world order activist?"
2007-02-06 12:50:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You need to look up the definition of Fascism, your thinking of totalitarianism, which still doesn't make your question make sense.
2007-02-06 12:53:33 · answer #10 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋