Dont you republicans agree we need to kick these welfare bums to the curb and make them fend for themselves? Isnt that what you say about those needing a handout?
2007-02-06 04:41:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
basically... and we're providing them with much more than just security...
from what I understand... the have free health care... well free to them, since we're paying for it....
why are we giving non-Americans free healthcare, and not Americans... when Americans are paying for it?
2007-02-06 05:23:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
certain that is. The SS fund has continually been in surplus. remember Bush borrowed billions of bucks from SS to commence his conflict in retaining with lies in Iraq. funds pumps into the SS fund 24-7, twelve months a year. see you later as human beings are operating billions proceed to flow the SS fund. that is been called the most perfect authorities software in historic past. This funds does no longer belong to the authorities it belongs to the human beings who've paid into it for decades for even as they retire or lose their activity. SS did no longer some thing to reason the deficit, the money Bush borrowed is owed to the human beings who had this funds deducted from their paychecks- plus interest. next they ought to bypass a regulation so as that no president or congress can borrow from the SS fund ever again. this is a debt owed to the yankee human beings and the rich do not imagine they ought to pay it lower back or pay for the conflict which the Republicans all started.
2016-11-25 20:22:36 · answer #2 · answered by rensing 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They do need to fend for themselves... economically. Since the beginning we've said that.
But when people are being shot and exploded on, we defend their physical security, just like we do for the bums currently on welfare all around the United States.
Burning consistency too hot for ya?
2007-02-06 04:46:13 · answer #3 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Timothy M. If we spent half the money on our own people that we currently waste on Iraq, we could cure cancer by now.
2007-02-06 04:48:41 · answer #4 · answered by catrionn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep we agree, sometime in the next year they step to the plate and we leave it to them totally! They are not the biggest welfare state but close,not when we spend $480 Billion a year in foreign aide!
2007-02-06 04:45:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
bush and his Friends are making a lot of money on the war and the American taxpayer is footing the bill , in money as well as lives . funny how no one ever mentions Iraq's oil and what is going on with it ? bush will blow it up and the American taxpayer will pay bushes Friends to rebuild at a extremely inflated price, that's the facts
2007-02-06 04:52:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only the able-bodied lazy ones who mooch off of society so they can be lazy and smoke cigarettes and get fat sitting on their couches watching Jerry Springer. Those who genuinely need assistance due to illness, disability, or age are fine with us.
2007-02-06 04:47:17 · answer #7 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The USA should cut ALL funds flowing to ALL middle east states.
2007-02-06 04:46:39 · answer #8 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yes this crap about handing them 2000 bucks everytime thier home is destroyed is getting old. I'm told they are buying homes and giving tips to police to raid it just to collect the money. Much like flood homes in the U.S.
2007-02-06 04:49:51 · answer #9 · answered by popeyethesadist 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope....it's still Arkansas
2007-02-06 04:46:41 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋