Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are just plain ignorant. It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?
2007-02-06 04:38:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"The great masses of people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than a small one. Especially if it is repeated over and over."
Adolf Hitler.
I think that just about sums it up. It's easier for them to look away, then it is to spend 6 years researching 9-11-2001. Yep, jet fuel burns at 750 degrees. Steel burns at 2500 degrees. Without the Thermite....those steel beams could not have buckled and collapsed.
They also don't want to know about the rolling black outs on certain floors of the towers 3 weeks before 9-11. The secret floors with all that loud noises and vibrating in it....the floor that you had to have a secret code to get into..and all the dust collecting on the other floors. And the mysterious men that came and went from those floors.
Marvin Bush was over security at the WTCs up to the day before 9-11.
The Caryle Group just 'happened' to be all together on 9-11 watching TV...and all of a sudden the planes hit the towers?
Cheney took NORAD away from Rumsfeld on 9-11...and told the military to 'stand down.'
Yep...even though those are proof.....but they seem to hard to accept? Some people just can't mentally handle the truth.
2007-02-06 05:02:16 · answer #1 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The steel did not have to melt for it to weaken. Look at how a blacksmith forms steel into horseshoes. It is heated to red hot and it become malleable. With the weight of all the floors above the one that the place crashed into all the steel supports had to do was become softer and they could no longer bear the weight. As far as the building taking 90 seconds to come down, come on. Do you realize the amounts of weight we are talking about? The building structure works to spread the weight loading out and when one part is compromised then the whole structure become compromised.
Quit drinking the Kool Aide there partner. If there was any real truth to the conspiracy nuts more real scientists would be shouting it out. There wouldn't be enough CIA types to silence them all. Instead the whole thing is kept alive by a few publicity seekers and nuts like you.
2007-02-06 04:49:30 · answer #2 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Compared to you Bush is as clean as the freshest snow on the south pole. If you knew anything about the periodic table you would know steel is not there and even if steel was an element the periodic table does not list melting points.
Keep posting idiotic questions. It shows every educated person here how stupid people like you are. Does lying make you feel like a big boy?
2007-02-06 05:32:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Bush was capable of that, then why wouldn't he have planted WMD's in Iraq? That would have made his plot to take over the world a lot easier, don't you think? Wait. You don't. Sorry. Nevermind....
2007-02-06 04:42:40 · answer #4 · answered by Militant Agnostic 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No he is not dirty. Take your "loose change", and buy a clue. If we all belived it was an inside job Chucky, you would tell us all "no it was an act of terrorism". Smoke up Johnny boy.
2007-02-06 04:55:15 · answer #5 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Chemistry is not Physics, Chucky. Wait until next semester and you'll get it.
2007-02-06 04:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know for a FACT that he showers every day. I use to walk his dog in Crawford.
2007-02-06 04:42:49 · answer #7 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
President Bush is dirty you say? Then he should take a good hot bath, scrub himself and all :)
2007-02-06 04:43:59 · answer #8 · answered by Смартасс 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't realise we were in the presence of a legit physicist.
Where'd you do your doctoral work?
All the other legit physicists and chemists have long debunked your phony physics and chemistry.
2007-02-06 04:42:59 · answer #9 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I can't keep track....
" Bush is a bumbling idiot"
" Bush is an evil genious"
" Bush is a bumbling idiot"
" Bush is an evil genious"
Would you wackos pleeeeeeeze make up your mind????
2007-02-06 04:50:56 · answer #10 · answered by fixinto 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋