English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

not good enough

2007-02-06 05:45:20 · answer #1 · answered by traveller 7 · 2 0

McClaren dropped him for many motives (ie, had to be sure his own rule), yet, from my attitude, this grew to become into his reason... McClaren knew by the time Euro 2008 and worldwide Cup 2010 strolled around, Beckham could have not have been given any section to play yet on the bench or interior the dressing room. He understood that his group grew to become into extra sensible while Beckham wasn't enjoying. Beckham grew to become into performed down the marvelous, which meant that the English group effectively had little width. even nevertheless Joe Cole grew to become into speedy down the left, Beckham grew to become right into a waste of area. He found out his group grew to become into extra sensible while Cole and Gerrard have been on the wings, with Lampard and Hargreaves interior the midsection. Or, with Cole and Lennon on the wings with a mixture of Gerrard and Hargreaves/Lampard interior the midsection. the two way, there grew to become into no room for Beckham on the bench. If the 1st formation grew to become into performed, effectively, Kirkland/Robinson/Foster, Lennon, Downing, Dafoe, Crouch, Bent, Walcott, Carrick, Carrragher, Richards, King, Brown, Barry, and so on, and Beckham needed have been combat for places on the bench. Beckham loves his united states of america, and that i'm particular he could be arranged to take a seat on the bench, yet i think of i could quite have footballers with skill on my bench for those friendlies; Walcott, Bent, Lennon, Downing; then play a practically washed up, former movie star. As we'd desire to consistently remember, those friendlies are to coach for the genuine spotlight, and in a 365 days or in 3, those youthful weapons nicely already be extra sensible ideas then Beckham. Beckham could have been a extra sensible decision off the bench in 2006, yet Sven wasn't going to try this. He needed a captain that commanded a longtime understand and could deliver stability to an English group interior the process a regime exchange, and that grew to become into Beckham.

2016-09-28 12:14:37 · answer #2 · answered by matzen 4 · 0 0

Nobody can play at his peak forever. He will be old at World Cup in 2010. It is best to focus on model/commercial while he is till famous now. He must make lot of money on this field.

2007-02-06 04:43:32 · answer #3 · answered by Henry 4 · 0 0

Because England is moving in a new direction............he does not figure into their future plans. He is getting old by football standards. He was never that good in the first place. His time has come and gone.

2007-02-06 06:03:02 · answer #4 · answered by cold runner 5 · 0 0

because the new national manager wants a renovation of the team, so beckham was not in the new team, and he has a slump in your skills game

2007-02-06 04:33:27 · answer #5 · answered by safari 7 · 0 0

He quit. Because he wasn't doing his job as good as he could have none of them did. Except for the young subsitute that come on the last mins of the match. Rugby is a much better game we won 42 to 13 scotland with just one possible mistake. You can hear the ref talking and what is said back to him it is a much cleaner and better game.

2007-02-06 04:31:58 · answer #6 · answered by sarell 6 · 0 1

If I recall correctly he wasn't dropped, but rather simply retired from the English national team.

2007-02-06 04:32:48 · answer #7 · answered by Die Fledermaus 2 · 0 1

He is a has been. That is why he then went to Europe and then to the US. It is a common downward spiral for soccer players when they are past their prime
It is only his high profile that leads to the perception of his ability

2007-02-06 04:37:13 · answer #8 · answered by Murray H 6 · 0 0

Because he was bloody useless in the world cup

2007-02-06 04:38:31 · answer #9 · answered by McQ 3 · 0 0

Because...stuart Mclaren...took over as manager..! I dont no whether its stuart mclaren or steve...!

2007-02-06 04:33:22 · answer #10 · answered by x-Kelly-x 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers