2007-02-06 04:10:00 · 13 answers · asked by Malcolm Knoxville 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Some good and honest people voted for the moron. They were lied to and duped. Some folks are easier to sucker in than others.
In 2004 his opponent was not the greatest choice either. The Democrats could have done better than Kerry.
2007-02-06 05:11:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, the majority of voters chose him. That's mob rule for ya. If you vote in the elections, you are legitimizing the outcome.
By the way, the majority of Americans (and, thus, the majority of voters) are of average to below average intelligence. These are the people choosing the 'leaders' that will tell you how you should live your life. Keep that in mind the next time you vote.
2007-02-06 04:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by Jo Blo 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
provided that his combatants in the 2000 and 2004 elections have been Al Gore and John Kerry- i think of that he replace into not greater powerful or worse than they have been (hence his winning the re-election bid). regardless of the undeniable fact that, there's a sparkling container of applicants for 2008, some who're actual well worth pondering (Giuliani and Obama) so i might probable not vote for Bush in the 2008 election if he replace into waiting to run.
2016-12-13 10:16:24 · answer #3 · answered by vannostrand 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Oil Companys
2007-02-06 04:13:06 · answer #4 · answered by zed10096 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Jo Blo - I actually agree with you. The average American is uneducated because of a government run education system. Continue to raise a class of citizen who thinks that they cannot survive w/o the federal gov't.
2007-02-06 04:43:54 · answer #5 · answered by fixinto 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sound mind? Not very many but not of sound mind, quite a few.
2007-02-06 04:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
this is a dumb question and shows how stupid you really are..
one could ask that of anyone.. take jimmy carter.. here is the worse prez in human HISTORY..
when carter was in office. we had a 21% interst rate. 19.5% inflation and a 10% unemployement rate and we had the now prez on iran holding us citez. as hostages.. but you still had the left wing wackos wanting him and his policy in place..
here is the point.
just because you dont like something about 1 guy doesnt mean he was bad,,
I could point out something with every prez.. liek clinton..
who would vote for him.. come on..
the world trade center was trucked bombed under clinton.. he had a meeting with monic
2 us embassy bombed... meeting with monic
1 military base bombed.. metting with monic
uss cole bombed meeting with monic
saddam shoots missiles at US jets.. meeting with monic...
dont get me wrong.. bush pisses me off in many ways..
the drug program... waste of money
tax cuts for people that dont pay taxes.. just wrong
making 21 million invators legal citzens.. wrong...
the war.. that was one of the right things he has done..
why?
it keeps the terriorist out of the US and in the middle east.. when we leave iraq.. so will the terriorist... dont think so??? really then why where they in the US under clinton... and yes they are and where.. and still are..
in the end. it comes down like this..
you can be stupid.. and wear a coat that says DNC or RNC.. but there is no difference.. they are the same.. they both suck.. just the DNC is alittle worse they want all your money and right now the RNC wants it to.. just alittle slower
2007-02-06 04:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Larry M 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋
He can't be voted for again. He's serving his second consecutive term.
2007-02-06 04:14:49 · answer #8 · answered by dorky_goddess 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I WOULD, ROFLZ LAWL. CUZ HEZ LYK YALE GRADUATE AN' WAZ IN SKUL N BON3Z CLUB, KK? DEY GAWT LYK OIL PPL 'N RICH PEEPS IN DERE LOL. HE'Z LYK GUD PRESIDEUNT CUZ HE PROTEK AGENST DE TERRORIST BUT U KAN'T VOTE 4 HIM AGEN CZU HE ALREADY SERV 2 TERMS, KK? SENCE HE CANT SERVE AGEN, I VOTE FOR WESLEY CLARK CUZ HE WUZ A GEN. AND KNOWS A THIN OR 2 BOUT MILITARYIES. BARACK OBAMA DONT HAV A REEL GOOD CHANCE I.M.O. CUZ OF TEH EXPERIENC FACTORZ. LYK, HE WAS A SEN. OF ILLINOISE N' EVERYTHIN BUT I TINK CLARK HAS BETTUR CHANCE CUZ WE HAV A BIG PROBLUM WIT IRAQ AND KOUNTRY NEEDZ HIS EXPURTIZ. EITHA WAI, I THINK ITZ CLEAR DAT DEMOCRAT GUNNA BE TEH NEXT PRES. ROAFLS!!! 11 1 1
2007-02-06 04:27:50 · answer #9 · answered by F1reflyfan 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Never. Hardcore right wing conservatives will, though...
2007-02-06 04:18:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋