English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We have to be great Americans and not let this happen to them dearies. They NEED to blame someone and that's all they know.
I think they would implode if they had no one to blame.

2007-02-06 03:50:13 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

George W. Bush of course.
You must be getting forgetful in your old age. Everything is Bushs fault. Or we will blame Reagan.Whatever feels good we do.

2007-02-06 03:53:36 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 3 1

Well, for a while they will have every right to lay the responsibility at the feet of President Bush and the Republicans, at least for the war in Iraq. If one party controls the White House and both houses of Congress, who else is responsible? In fact, the Republicans should stand up proudly and take the responsibility. They didn't need a single Democrat to do whatever it is they have done in Iraq.

2007-02-06 13:18:21 · answer #2 · answered by ktd_73 4 · 0 0

They can blame obstructionist Republicans, the same way the Pubs blamed them for 6 years. The American people spoke at the polls in November and increasingly show their displeasure with this war, yet Republicans have blocked the debate that should take place while we the people demand it. Bush has acted as if this is a monarchy, so it is time to take the running of this country back to the people.

2007-02-06 03:57:37 · answer #3 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 3 0

The Democrats gained a majority of the homestead of Representatives on the 2006 election, which took over in 2007. The Senate became right into a tie in 2006. It became into 40 9-40 9, with 2 Independents. persons that say the Democrats took over all of Congress insist it relatively is the case simply by fact those 2 Independents (Joe Lieberman and Bernie Sanders) caucused with the Democrats, which they stated relatively gave the Democrats a fifty one-40 9 majority. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, people who say that forget that Joe Lieberman became into appearing like a Republican, and might extraordinarily much continually vote with them. in fact, via 2008 he became into caucusing with the Republicans in the Senate, and subsidized John McCain for the Presidency over his very own social gathering's candidate. So relatively, Democrats had administration of the homestead of Representatives in basic terms; and a tie in the Senate. so they very hardly have been given something previous the Republicans. on the few events whilst Joe Lieberman did undergo in innovations he became right into a Democrat, wager who became into there to veto something that got here out of Congress...this is the superb option, George W. Bush. In different words, all of Bush's rules that have been rubberstamped by via the previous Republican Congress have been nonetheless in place till the Democrats finally took a majority in the two residences of Congress as nicely simply by fact the Presidency--which surpassed off in 2009. on account that then, the financial device has all started a restoration, housing expenses have stablized, the inventory industry has regained over 50%, and the interest industry losses have slowed to under 33% of what they have been whilst Bush became into in workplace.

2016-10-01 12:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Bush, as he has been completely inflexible. Or we could try the minority in Congress, as they are filibustering so we cannot debate the situation in Iraq. Reminds me of the 90's when Newt and his cronies made the Federal Govt shutdown.

2007-02-06 03:57:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

~We'll blame those responsible, Bush and his followers. It's going to take a long time to clean up the mess he made, but the Democrats are still willing to do it for the sake of our country!!
It will take work and time. Thanks to Bush, there is more than no money left.~

2007-02-06 04:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

anyone else but themselves...they need to throw in the towel,,its over for them,,yield to the GOP,,and just let bush handle IRAQ,,,they can play cards and yak yak,,with themselves,,,let them blame each other,,and that's the truth,,,flip flopper's,,,so much for Hillary Clinton 2008,,what a joke that is,,,,and still funny too...decider Jr

2007-02-06 04:30:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So true. For a long time it will still be Bush, even after he gets out and passes away cause it's the groove they are stuck in. Have you noticed like with Katrina, they are still blaming Bush for not helping them when there is a houseful of Democrats! I would have thought with all the bawling the Demo's did about the injustice they would have jumped right on it! Are they? No, and yet the Mayor bashed Bush for not mentioning it in his speech.

2007-02-06 04:02:09 · answer #8 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0 4

People like you create very easy targets for Democrats. If you weren't so ignorant, you wouldn't be so easy to blame.

2007-02-06 04:42:05 · answer #9 · answered by John S 1 · 0 0

They would blame the unborn babies.. I mean fetuses. It's always their fault. They have so much power.

2007-02-06 04:09:19 · answer #10 · answered by Culture Warrior 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers