English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-06 03:46:39 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

assuming that he still alive

2007-02-06 03:55:07 · update #1

14 answers

Considering Saddam is dead I would have to say Kim Jong Ill.

2007-02-06 03:50:27 · answer #1 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 3 0

Kim Jong Il is definitely worse than Saddam Hussein ever was. After the first Gulf War, Saddam didn't pose any threat to us, whereas Kim Jong Il did and still does. After all, the man has already developed nuclear weapons!

2007-02-06 03:52:20 · answer #2 · answered by tangerine 7 · 0 0

Assuming you mean Saddam Hussein while he was still alive, I'd still go with Kim Jong Il. While it turned out that Saddam never really had weapons of mass destruction, it's a foregone conclusion that North Korea has nuclear capabilities. That makes that country much more dangerous, thus making its leader (who appears to be a little crazy) extremely dangerous as well.

2007-02-06 03:50:59 · answer #3 · answered by Jaybeas 2 · 0 0

Kim Jong gets my vote for worst of the two. Mostly because Saddam is out of the BadGuy buisness. A long drop from a rope will do it everytime!

2007-02-06 04:00:32 · answer #4 · answered by Mother 6 · 0 0

Good question. Saddam tortured and killed his own people Kim Johng Ill is simply letting his people starve. Which is worse?

2007-02-12 10:51:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kim. At least Saddam was trying to keep order, usually only gassing violent radicals who just wanted to kill people; yes, saddam did tend to get a bit extreme on it all. Kim just starves his people to get attention and aid, aid which he just ends up spending on weapons.

2007-02-11 20:28:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saddam is dead, so Kim Jong Il.

2007-02-06 03:50:50 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3 0

Kim Jong ill....however he has the largest standing army in the world, so we're gonna let him be.

2007-02-06 03:50:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Bush Is the worst.
Neither Saddam nor Kim caused the suffering of thousands of people and the death of many US people.

2007-02-06 03:49:39 · answer #9 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 1 3

Well considering Saddam is no longer with us, that only leaves us with one choice from your options.

2007-02-06 03:49:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers