Sure. It means that if you have one number times a sum of numbers: a(b+c+d+e+...), then all you have to do is multiply the first number by each number in sequence, and add them all together....
ab+ac+ad+ae+...
2007-02-06 03:36:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by bequalming 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try thinking of it in terms of coins.
Your parents give you an allowance of $10 a week plus an amount equal to the allowance you have left from the last $10. Let's say you have 1 quarter, 2 dimes and 2 pennies. You can figure how much extra they will give you in two different ways:
2 times (1 quarter, 2 dimes and 2 pennies) equals 2 times 47¢ equals 94¢.
or:
2 times (1 quarter, 2 dimes and 2 pennies) equals 2 times 1 quarter + 2 times 2 dimes + 2 times 2 pennies equals 2 quarters + 4 dimes + 4 pennies equals 50¢ + 40¢ + 4¢ equals 94¢.
The second way shows the distributive property (of multiplication). The nice thing is, since they are, by this property, identical ways of solving, we do not have to worry about which we choose to use. We can pick either one.
2007-02-06 03:54:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by roynburton 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a class there are 10 boys and 15 girls.
The teacher decides to give two pens to each student.
How many pens are needed?
The number can be determined in these two ways.
First we find the number of students.
Number of boys and number of girls is 10 + 15 = 25.
Since each has to be given 2 pens total pens needed is
2 x 25 = 50.
The other way of calculating this is:
We distribute the pens separately for boys and girls.
For the 10 boys the number of pens needed is 2 x 10 = 20.
20 pens are distributed to the boys.
For the 15 girls the number of pens needed is 2 x 15 = 30
30 pens are distributed to the girls.
Total number of pens distributed is 20 + 30 = 50.
In the second method we distribute the pens separately for boys and girls.
In the first method we distribute the pens irrespective of the sex of the students.
In both case the total number remains the same.
This is the distributive property.
2007-02-06 04:26:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pearlsawme 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it relatively is conceivable, yet no longer in all probability right here as I see it. appreciate is extra significant than listening or information. the issue with adults is, they think of it relatively is all approximately them, and that they think of under-18s be attentive to no longer something with reference to the international. i think of this is the only reason no person listens to me, nonetheless what I say makes each little bit of expertise. on each occasion a feminist has emailed me (have faith me, maximum of them are not friendly), they have by no potential did no longer point out that my age makes me much less knowledgeable and socially conscious than them. large. the best answerer right here, Rio Madeira, is not any extra suitable than 6 years older than i'm. i do no longer think of it relatively is the listening or the information this is lacking right here, it relatively is attractiveness and appreciate. i be attentive to many feminists can study and comprehend what I submit, yet simply by my being youthful than them they have not have been given any appreciate for my perspectives, and in spite of what I pen being real, they by no potential settle for the fact. The feminists comprehend what i'm saying, yet they're too close-minded to settle for the fact. they might see the fact, yet they gained't settle for it.
2016-10-01 12:38:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let a_1, a_2, ..., a_n be n arbitrary terms: numbers, expressions, etc. Let k be a number, expression, etc. Then,
k * (a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n) = (k * a_1) + (k * a_2) + ... + (k * a_n).
The distributive property appears in several numeric sets, and many non-numerical sets; it is part of the definition of a ring. More information at the sources.
2007-02-06 03:49:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by jcastro 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it means:
2*(5+10) = 2*5+2*10
either one will get you the same answer but the earlier one is easier to do
2007-02-06 03:37:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋