Crawford Texas says they don't want their man back though....
2007-02-06 03:33:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Earl 3
·
6⤊
4⤋
Unfortunately, politics have become so devise and unforgiving in the last few years, that by admitting ANY fallacy in Bush and his actions, seemingly insinuates (to the opposition) a fallacy in their philosophy also. This is flawed logic to automatically tie the two together, but they do have to be on guard from liberals that would use the President's shortcomings as a means of attacking the Party and the Conservative philosophy as a whole. Being the figure-head to one's party is part of the duty of a president, and it can, at times, be a double edged sword.
I am a very liberal Democrat, and I do not support this president, but I am also smart enough to know that you CANNOT group Republicans under one banner and say that they are "all this" or "all that" because of Bush. Yet I do feel the voices within that party that DO NOT agree with Bush are not loud enough to invoke change in him. Lame duck presidents have only their legacy to answer to. I feel history will show George W. Bush wanting.
2007-02-06 03:57:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by bignupe2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I actually think most Republicans understand Mr. Bush is a babbling idiot much of his speaking time. I also think that if you take away the war and all that is tied to it, Mr. Bush would look like a mighty grand leader who has found great success. I've generally been a Democrat, but I have experienced great times under this presidency. I would like to see the war end, but taking that away, life is wonderful.
2007-02-06 04:10:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by straightup 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow! I merely had the strangest sense of deja vue. What year is it? 2004? No wait it truly is 2008? there is no conspiracy, yet polls are literally not solid. This actuality retains to be proved and it would not really count number who they coach greatest at any given time. the merely pollthat concerns will happen on November 4, 2008.
2016-11-02 11:53:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by lobos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well why not? The democrats are always glorifying theirs. It is just more of the partisan BS that is ruining out political process and turning our misrepresentatives into a big clown circus. Let us all observe a moment of silence to mourn the death of civilized debate in America.
2007-02-06 03:42:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I'm not in denial. I know exactly what is going on in the world today. I still support Bush. Why? Because he is doing exactly what i voted him into office for. That is to stand up and fight terrorism and to win the war in Iraq. So far he is doing what I voted for and has kept his word to go all the way and not back down. So I'm pleased with my decision.
2007-02-06 03:36:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
One of the many problems with the American people is that they spend too much time trying to place the blame on someone else for about everything they don't like about their lives. And yes, I am an American.
2007-02-06 03:40:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Don 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
We aren't. Why are democrats "constantly in a state of denial about" their flip flopping, lying candidates?
2007-02-06 03:38:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by lucasandmariepape 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Why are democrats so stupid and cowardly?
I'm not a repub but I wouldn't want to be associated with the likes of someone as stupid as you.
2007-02-06 03:48:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Repukes has to justefy their existance even if it defies the normes of humanity and deceny!
2007-02-06 03:36:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by WO LEE 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
~They don't want to admit they made a mistake voting for him. Bush admits he made mistakes, why can't they?~
2007-02-06 03:47:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋