This is NOT a simultaneous equation in the accepted sense since it is stated x=y
From inspection both x and y = 4
There can be no other values and the normal substitution method is not required.
In simultaneous equations you are working out the values of x and y which satisfy BOTH equations.
In the example you quote the ONLY coordinates are when x = 4, y = 4 therefore a series of coordinates may not be plotted in either of the equations given.
There are no variables.
2007-02-06 04:42:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by CurlyQ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
y=x,x+y=8
==> x+x=8
==>x=4
==>x=4,y=4
2007-02-06 04:29:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
x=y=4
2007-02-06 03:12:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by tor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
0+8, 1+7, 2+6, 3+5, 4+4
2007-02-06 03:05:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by T-Pow Frizz Girl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
if x=y then the first equation reads x+x = 8 so x=4. y is 4 also
2007-02-06 03:19:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by kinvadave 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, use between the equations to sparkling up for x in words of y. case in element, utilising the first equation: 2x = 3y +2 --------> x = a million.5y + a million Then change for x into the 2d equation: 4(a million.5y +a million) - 7y = -3 -----------> 6y + 4 - 7y = -3 ---------> -y+4 = -3 Then sparkling up for y: -y + 4 = -3 --------> -y = -7 --------> y=7 Then change for y into both equation to sparkling up for x: 2x - 3y = 2 --------> 2x - 21 = 2 ---------> 2x = 23 --------> x = 11.5 in case you double verify utilising x = 11.5 and y = 7 for both equations, you'll see that this works.
2016-12-03 19:23:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
something x + something y = 8
something x and something y are equal so the answer has to be half of 8 which as u know equals 4, i hope u understand xxx
2007-02-06 08:19:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by ... 1
·
0⤊
0⤋