Interestingly mammals have very rarely evolved poisonous tissue/blood to counter predation, whereas it is very common in insects and plants and exists to some degree in fish. Is there something that is preventing this from evolving or is it present to a lesser degree in mammals, as in some mammals taste bad etc. I feel there must be an evolutionary trade off to being a poisonous mammal for this not to have occurred, or that to distribute enough quick acting poison is probably impossible in large mammals. But even bad tasting or inedible flesh should be enough for predators to quickly learn not to prey on certain mammals. For instance if rabbits were as poisonous as a cane toad or at least inedible, what would stop rabbits from taking over the world (so to speak)?
That seems to point to me an important fact, that intraspecies competition is driving evolution more strongly than interspecies competition, also possibly digestive counter measures are evolving among predators in tandem
2007-02-06
02:43:49
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology