For sure. definitely positively splendidious.....Spin spin spin, spam spam spam from the Republicans....they don't want to pay for the war, and Hillary will make them. I'm sure with half a brain, all Americans want out!!!
2007-02-06 02:34:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Earl 3
·
4⤊
5⤋
God forbid Hillary ever gets elected. She may have made a promise to end the war, but by what means and at what cost? I do not agree with what Bush has done or is doing, but this is something that needs to be handled carefully and with great intelligence about war strategies and such. I do not believe that Hillary has that expertise, nor does George for that matter...
P.S. Newsflash...ALL of the candidates are going to say that they will end the war in Iraq...
2007-02-06 02:35:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by bumpy560 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
You're happy because you're extremely uninformed.
Hillary will not "end the war in Iraq." The war in Iraq is simply a battleground in the greater war on terror. Even if Hillary fulfils this promise, it hardly means that the greater problem will be resolved. In fact it will cause greater bloodshed in Iraq, embolden terrorists, who will then spread their destructive plans elsewhere. Hillary knows this. She justs says whatever she thinks will make people like you "happy."
2007-02-06 02:33:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
regrettably, the in hardship-free words thanks to understand no matter if that is in hardship-free words a promise to get votes, or the authentic deal should be to decide on her and discover out. i'm a touch leary of everybody who says that they could carry out a touch particular element (jointly with pull the troops) with out having the finest concepts accessible. Granted, even having the finest concepts accessible, does not mean that you'll do the right element (ought to GWB extremely have invaded Iraq?). regardless of the indisputable fact that, status on one's proverbial stump and putting forward "If elected and the concepts I have then nonetheless shows what i have been shown now, i will xxxxx" ... gained't get coated on CNN. Any soldier, any protection rigidity tactitian, will inform you that there are cases to resign combating with out prevailing. we've considered actual no data (credible or in the different case) that asserts that 20000 people better will turn the tide. we've considered a good number of knowledge that our continued presense there is making the region worse. If we were to vanish the following day, there should be quite a number of blood shed regardless of the indisputable fact that it ought to attain equilibrium exceptionally instantly. Sounds exceptionally chilly ... yet once you're counting bodies, any opposite direction is even chillier. we've the finest troops contained in the international, yet they're in hardship-free words a device of the yankee people. in case you attempt to apply a device for something it wasn't designed for, you'll likely finally end up breaking the device.
2016-12-03 19:22:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very much so. I believe it will keep her from getting elected.
It's not that I wouldn't like to see the war end, but now she'll actually have to come out with a PLAN for how to accomplish this lofty goal. If she has one, she's not sharing it with anyone. I don't believe she has any idea how to do it. She just says whatever she thinks the public wants to hear.
Like Kerry, trying to be everyone's best friend will come back to bite her in the butt. You can't tell one group one thing and the next group the opposite. They find out. We're not that dumb, Hillary!
.
2007-02-06 02:31:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by FozzieBear 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
And you believe her? She has had so many different positions on this war it is hard to remember which is the latest. She goes with whatever position she thinks will get her elected. And that is not a good stance for a leader. Tony Blair only had one fixed policy until he was elected and that was 'I want power'. And look at what a screw up he has been.
2007-02-06 02:51:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Elizabeth Howard 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
She is all talk. As soon as the opinion polls change so does she. She absolutely has no plan, she goes with her advisers. The war in Iraq will be going on long after we are gone. She cannot end it. Just shows how dillusional she is. If you believe her you have not paid full attention to the history of this war.
2007-02-06 02:37:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Travis 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Check the record since WW II, every politician running for president during a war has said they would stop the war. Is Hilary any different, No.
2007-02-06 02:34:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sgt 524 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
I am thrilled, but so are the terrorists, most likely.
I am thrilled because I hope her arrogance and narrow-minded thinking will cost her the White House. She has no plan...she is just saying what she thinks people want to hear.
2007-02-06 02:47:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'll believe it when I see it. Right now that is the easiest way to get votes, say that you are gonna bring the troops back. I honestly hope somebody does bring them back and we can get out of this pointless war.
2007-02-06 02:39:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by crippler5511 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
If anyone is happy to hear that a presidential candidate will back down from America's committment, then she should be run out of the country, period.
2007-02-06 02:38:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋