Should George Bush have forgiven the Al Quida terrorists and stayed out of the War on Terror?

Answer 1

That's basically what he's done compared to what I would have done.

If I were President, I'd nuke Tehran and Damascus and then demand cooperation from every other muslim country, including shutting down the mosques and arresting the extremists, unless they wanted to be nuked too.

Answer 2

Could you have forgiven them if you had lost someone in the Trade Center towers?

Funny how nearly everyone in the U.S. after the attacks on the trade centers wanted George Bush to "do something" about the people who attacked us.

Then after he does something about it you freak out because he actually used the military to accomplish that goal. Granted I know that no-one wants to believe the links that were presented to us as a precursor for Iraq. They were extremeley flimsy.

In any case, the point is, is that while some of us may disagree with what Bush has done with his time in office an all out forgiveness for what they did to us doesn't seem possible.

Answer 3

Absolutely not! The President is charged with protection of his citizens. He would have been impeached the next week if he had just forgiven the terrorist. As a matter of fact the Dems said that he moved too slow after 9/11.

Answer 4

at first, extra terrorist assaults have been planned and extra people have died simply by terrorism under Bush, then under Clinton. lower back whilst Clinton have been president, Republicans have been watering down his anti-terrorism expenditures simply by fact they did no longer desire "a police state." whilst Clinton tried to kill Osama, they performed the wag the canines game. as a replace of status at the back of him, they stated he became into in basic terms attempting to alter the issue removed from the BJ. whilst blackhawk went down, Republicans voted alongside with Democrats to take the troops out. The conflict Powers Act gave congress the potential to try this. Repubs won't be able to do this once which criticize Democrats for no longer doing sufficient. Bush, on the different hand, surpassed over terrorism for months whilst perchance he might have completed something. this is in accordance to Richard Clark, government' anti-terrorism expert on account that Reagan.

Answer 5

No one should forgive what they did. I just wish we were actually after the terrorists, instead of fighting insurgents, occupying an entire country, and creating more terrorists for the next generation.

We are losing the war on terror, both militarily and idealistically. We need to get the troops to somwhere they can make a difference, insted of shouting at the wind in Iraq, and dying every day.

Answer 6

It would be nice if Bush would identify the enemy, all he does is rant about some phantom terrorist that seam to be Iraq citizens now. Where is Osama Bin Laden and the Pakistanis, and "OH" the Saudis from the 9/11 attack.....Spin Spin Spin. Americans are way more intelligent than Neocons.

Answer 7

No. He did the right thing by going across the water he just didnt stay in Afghanastan long enough. He admitted that he doesnt keep up with the man that is suspected of bombing the USS Cole and attacking the WTC towers. So he was suppose to join the war on terror he just attacked the wrong man and the wrong the place like he did.

Answer 8

He should have gone directly after Osama bin Laden and the rest of Al Qaeda in the first place instead of going to Iraq. If he'd done that, bin Laden might have been brought to justice by now and we wouldn't be stuck in a disastrous war with no end in sight.

Answer 9

Forgiven the Al Quida terrorists??????

Spoken like a true Democrat.

Answer 10

Wake up. He did forget the Al Qaeda terrorists. He went into Iraq and started a second war which wasnt even linked to Al Qaeda or 911 which allowed Al Qaedas top leaders such as Osama to escape into the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan.