English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The hints are in the names Engels, Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin and others. It was created to destroy all Kingdoms, because they couldn't control them. WWI was created to destroy Russia. WWII was created to destroy Germany and Austria. WWIII is coming and will be created to destroy Arab countries. Of course, all countries who have fought in the wars have all lost. They gained nothing. The winners were the International Bankers. They finance the wars and they profit from them.

2007-02-06 01:53:35 · 8 answers · asked by Bessie H 1 in Arts & Humanities History

8 answers

In my understanding at the present moment. it is a social ecology system most likely set up because another leader wanted the space for his own seed. Why the thing is allowed to spread like a fire or a disease within the central nervous system of a society is the question I have pondered. To have allowed the one such a large territory is quite a manipulative movement and decision. It would be wise for each community to not make such a promise in the giving of so much leverage over the people. do not( I pray) give them more than a poor mans wage for he is a servant deserving of servant work and wage.

2007-02-06 02:24:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I have to question some of your assumptions. Although World War One did result in the destruction of Czarist Russia it was fought by the Allies to curb the expansionist policies of Germany and Austria - and by the Central powers to curb Serbian terrorism ( which Russia tended to protect). World War Two was fought to roll back the tide of Nazi conquest - by then Austria was a part of Nazi Germany. If there is a World War with the Arab states it will be unlike either of the two early conflicts as the Arab states cannot field large and powerful field armies - it would be a matter of irregular warfare and terrorism. However it is worrying to note that China - which does have territorial ambitions on Taiwan, Outer Mongolia, and ultimately Siberia, is building a power ful navy spearheaded by 50 nuclear attack submarines and three powerful armored Divisions equipped to match those of the US. There you do have the components of a major Third World War!.

I do not think that bankers would want to see anything like that - war is bad for business, and globalization - which has thrived in the absence of large scale conflict - has been superbly profitable for banks around the world. However, if global warming does serious damage to the planet - we could well see "resource" wars about access to water and usable arable land.

2007-02-06 02:34:59 · answer #2 · answered by Tony B 6 · 0 0

Modern Communism is usually attributed to the works of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels though its philosophical roots go back further into history. People such as Rousseau and Fourier and even earlier figures such as Thomas More in the 16th century espoused ideas based on common ownership of property.

Marx and Engels built on these previous works and difffered from their predecessors by focusing on class struggle and revolution as the means to achieve a communist state. This version of Communism is more properly known as Marxism. These theories were further developed by the Bolsheviks in Russia, in particular Vladimir Illych Lenin and it is the fusion of his ideas with the earlier Marxism that gave birth to both modern Communism (Marxism-Leninism) and the Soviet Union.

As to why Communism was introduced, its earliest forms were a reaction to the desperate conditions of the working classes during the industrial revolution. Many of these ideas were utopian attempts to alleviate suffering and deseve credit for their basic humanitarianism. However, like many good ideas this was later perverted to justify revolution and totalitarianism.

2007-02-06 02:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by Cymro 2 · 2 0

That is a paranoid world view.
Communism was created as a counterbalance to the abuses and injustices of the early industrial revolution. Today, the influence of Marx's ideas can still be seen in labor unions and the regulation of working conditions.

2007-02-06 02:20:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Maybe no communist society has yet been created. Dunno about WW111 but communism is meant to be the natural progression for humanity in the post-capitalist, post nation-state world. Angry Russian peasants do not fit Marx's vision of a class conscious population cr eating social change through their own personal agency and collective actions. No-one gets killed in a communist revolution - it's the hegemony which is overthrown not the tyrants.

2007-02-06 02:31:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Karl Marx so everybody would be equal in his mind

2007-02-06 01:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by Wesley™ 5 · 1 0

Lennon to overthrow monarchy in Russia and take control.

2007-02-06 02:23:15 · answer #7 · answered by robert m 7 · 1 1

You ask a question - then you answer it. Gosh "bessie" - I'll go withdraw my money from my bank account now!

2007-02-06 02:35:21 · answer #8 · answered by WMD 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers