2007-02-06 01:51:31 · 24 answers · asked by jwood 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Strengths – Name recognition due to her husband. Liberal. One of a handful of women who want to be President of the USA.
Weaknesses – She is very controversial, has no experience running a state or local government. Has not successfully sponsored or co-sponsored any legislation in the senate. Tends to flip flop on issues depending on which way the wind is blowing in the polls. Wants to raise taxes and steal corporate profits. Several people that used to work with her said that she has an extremely bad temper. She was caught trying to character assianate Barack Obama.
The negatives for this woman go on and on and on.
Why would anyone want to elect this woman to the presidency? She doesn't even have enough experience to be a CEO of a company, much less the President of the United States.
2007-02-06 01:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
H3ll no! Everyone listen for just one minute ok. I'm not lying when I say this! My grandmas neighbors son used to be in the CIA and used to guard the Clintons back when they were President and he said that Hiliary used to run around the White House swearing at President Clinton while he would not talk back. Then when the media came she turned like a light switch and she was all happy and nice. That was a regular day in the White House for the Clintons. Also she is not what you call a good leader, she is like "Sonny" in the original Godfather movie part one. Remember when Don Corleone got shot thenn Sonny went on a rampage, thus equalling what will happen if Hilary is elected.
2007-02-06 02:03:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She should run for office in Iraq since she's such an expert. I'm tired of hearing that Bush messed everything up - he had the gonads to go after the ba$^ards that attacked the US when Bill Clinton turned the other cheek and opened the door to more terrorist activity which directly caused 9-11. The Bush administration put a stop to it; whether the war in Iraq is right is great to debate because it is better than a war on our soil.
2007-02-06 02:42:34 · answer #3 · answered by Sassygirlzmom 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She doesn't stand by her word as far as the war. She was for the war, then she was against it, then she was for the surge until Bush was, now she is against it. If she is like this on something this important I am worried on how she will handle other things. Also if anyone starts out with I want (comprehensive) you pick the topic, I want to know what comprehensive means. I am just looking for someone to just stand up for what they believe in. Also I was just in upstate NY the unemployment rate is very high, property taxes are out of control 3-4 times what we pay in the south. And gas was 62 cents a gallon higher than the average of all the other states on the way to NY. I spent a week there and I was not impressed with the situation. People deserve better.
2007-02-06 02:05:30 · answer #4 · answered by River 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Senator has 8 years experience in the White House and more than six years in the Senate. Because of her travels during her years in the White House she is highly regarded.
We are going to need someone strong and experienced to heal wounds throughout the World. I believe she can mend fences especially with what was our close allies Germany and France.
Iraq is an unjust War. What is going to happen after Bush has exasperated conditions in Iran and it comes down to a War. Perhaps they can be reached by Diplomacy if not we need a United Front. The Moron in the White House does not understand that this is a small World and we cannot stand alone against terrorism. He has not defeated it he has spread it. Iraq was not home to terrorists. Saddam was anything but a Good Muslim. He was secular and lived life of a whore. Radical Fundamentalists wanted nothing to do with him. We need Senator Clinton and Bill to heal wounds.
2007-02-06 02:11:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Understand, first, that I am inclined to vote for ANY Democrat for president after the debacle of the Bushco years. But I think she is making a PR blunder now, as seen in the latest clips of her pledging to remove us from Iraq her first day in office, by trying to come on so tough. She is a notch or two away from shrill and nagging and angry. I am talking general public perception here. She needs to keep it soft and personable. Kerry sounded like the voice of prophetic doom, and while he was correct, it did him no good because he looked like a hand-wringing worry-wart next to smirking, happy-go-lucky retard Bush. The Democrats need to recall this and take it as a lesson in what works and what doesn't.
2007-02-06 01:57:24 · answer #6 · answered by Typical McCain Supporter 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's definitely the best choice, especially if Obama will take the VP slot.
2007-02-06 01:55:10 · answer #7 · answered by Hi y´all ! 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Compared to the other names i have heard being thrown around by BOTH sides - yeah.
2007-02-06 02:03:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think she would be a great President!!! Anyone would be a hell of alot better then the jack *** that we have right now!!!
2007-02-06 02:01:16 · answer #9 · answered by carolyn28h 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
President of FRANCE maybe.
2007-02-06 01:54:51 · answer #10 · answered by donkey hotay 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋