English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

Both might. However, it could be argued that the naturalized citizen placed a greater value on gaining citizenship in another country and a lesser value on the citizenship of their birth country.
Regardless of who values it more, the goal of both should be to preserve, better yet, improve opportunity for future generations.

Let's ALL take a deep look into what WE have and recognize the value of having it. Then, WE can Begin Loving it, Protecting it, Sharing it, Placing more, Adding more, So We will appreciate (not depreciate) passing on something that's Valuable.

2007-02-06 07:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by askthetoughquestions 3 · 1 0

I am a citizen by birth; my wife is going through the naturalization process and my stepson is serving in the US military.

I would say that I value my freedoms more than the average native-born simply because my military service.

My wife and stepson truly want to be American Citizens. To them getting full citizenship is a goal and something they are really looking forward to. IMO - they appreciate what we have here more than 95% of the native-born people.

2007-02-06 12:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

Things we get for free, we take for granted. Things we have to work for, we value.

2007-02-06 10:33:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers