She has virtually no opinions of her own. She says she will end the war but refuses to cut off funding for it.
She says "Bush Lied" but said she "personally reviewed" all the material that her to make the same decision Bush made. Therefore, if Bush "lied", then she also "Lied" to her constituants and led them into this "unpopular war".
She claims that she can "lead" the U.S. and reclaim our respect throughout the world by effectively dealing with world leaders.... but she can't even control her husband.
She wants us to be energy independent.... but voted against drilling in Alaska, Florida and California.
She thinks queer marriage should be legal.... but abstained from the senate vote to legalize it.
She criticises the war, but offers no plan for how withdrawing our forces can safely work in the region.
AND... WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO THE VINCE FOSTER INVESTIGATION? HOW DID MISSING BILLING RECORDS TURN UP ON A COFFEE TABLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
2007-02-06 00:40:47 · 13 answers · asked by merlins_new_apprentice 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
doesn't matter what her last name is......
gender doesn't matter either.....
just do not like her or her voting record or her contradictory opinions from one day to the next
2007-02-06 04:52:18 · answer #1 · answered by mcspic63 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thinking the shown reality that Ohio quite has a better p.c. of knowledgeable people than all maximum any state that Obama has gained its exceptionally difficult to say that its an education difficulty. Obama is a tremendous supporter of NAFTA, he purely tried to lie and were given stuck - which failed to help. NAFTA is doubtless better major to obama than telling his supporters the reality, so are you able to extremely blame the individuals of Ohio for balloting for hillary.
2016-12-03 19:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by gagliano 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, why would you vote for that dried up old bag of 3 day old dog meat if her name wasn't Clinton. And as for myself, I would especially not vote for anyone ever with the name Clinton. Remember, she said she "loathes the military" maybe they don't like the old bag either and might not want to risk their lives for her slimy behind.
2007-02-06 00:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would have 0 interest in voting for her even if her name was Rumplestiltskin...It is her I have no faith in...nothing to do with the name.
2007-02-06 00:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by ticklemeblue 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for Hillary even if she was George Washington's wife.
2007-02-06 00:50:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If her name wasn't Clinton, she'd probably be in some minimum security prison as a crooked lawyer.
2007-02-06 00:48:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
In fact, all the negativity that I've read about Hillary has been regarding her affiliation to her husband. So, if anything, he will be a hindrance, rather than a help...
2007-02-06 00:44:22 · answer #7 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Great question, Don't need you to build your case for why you don't like her. If you want to know what people think just ask the question.
I don't think people would pay her much attn.
2007-02-06 03:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by River 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for Hillary in any election, presidential or senate. Women should not be in politics!
2007-02-06 00:46:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
not interested anyway in voting for her....but she does have all of bills old political contacts and those might come in handy (its always about who u know)
2007-02-06 00:43:07 · answer #10 · answered by jenivive 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋