Evolution and "eye" .... Why are evolutionists so helpless to explain how an eye evolved to this perfection?

Question

Of course this is not the only unscientific part of this rubbish theory.
How can we expect one explain an eye if he fails to explain a single cell ?
They make ridiculous explanations about how a single cell(which is more complex than a city ) formed .
They have to remember the fact that a complex structure can not live and then diffuse soon , only if one of the components is missing.
How come a single cell will wait "millions of years" and by the help of coincidences , it will complete itself and begin to work.
***
It is the same to believe the idea;
"A timber became furniture after millions of years"
May God give some brain in your heads.

Answer 1

Why are Creationists so hopeless in doing research that they think that evolutionists are "helpless" to explain something. Have you ever asked them? Have you ever tried actually *reading* these answers? Is there even a *trace* of a chance that you will read any of the answers here and read them honestly?

At the bottom of the very page you used to post this question, is a a Search box. Did you think to use it?

Or ... there's this new site you may not have heard of called Google (www.google.com). Try it:
1. Go to a Google.
2. Type "eye evolution"
3. See just how "helpless" we are to explain the eye.

There are 26,200,000 hits. How "helpless" is that?

Is that too many for you? Here are the 5 links at the top of the list:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/1/l_011_01.html
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20050822230316data_trunc_sys.shtml
http://ebiomedia.com/gall/eyes/eye1.html
http://www.karger.com/gazette/64/fernald/art_1_0.htm
http://library.thinkquest.org/28030/eyeevo.htm

Thank you for providing such a clear illustration of WHY creationists are so well known for their scientific knowledge, fairness, and skills as researchers.

Answer 2

First off, the eye is very easily explained through evolution and science.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_for_evolution#Analogous_structures_and_convergent_evolution

Second, what are those explanations as to how a single cell formed. Because evolution says a single cell EVOLVED from simpler life forms. And the start of those simpler life forms are not covered in evolution. That is called abiogenesis.

Answer 3

The eye as evolved. You don't need the eye as it is today for it to have some benefit. If it only able to tell the difference between darkness and light it is of value. That gives you an idea why your silly argument is wrong. Now run off to your silly Bible stories. You should be grateful I have taken this time to answer your silly question. I've got more intelligent questions to answer.

Answer 4

Scientists have a perfectly good explanation of how an eye evolves. They came up with it about 70 years ago. But the creationists haven't heard the word yet, because they are not listening. Perhaps their heads are stuck somewhere where they can't hear anything.

Answer 5

1. I woke up this morning and put on my glasses. I put on my glasses. An intelligent design of my eye would have included muscles to focus my eyes without glasses. No intelligent design here. Move along.

2. The nerves from our eyes come out the front of the retina, and then goes through the retina. This is why we have a blind spot. This appears to be a very backward design, and not something an engineer would make! No intelligent design here. Move along.

Answer 6

Evolution derives its source from pagan religions because it does not distinguish between the Creator and the creature.
What Darwin proposed is not new. It goes way back in antiquity. Evolution therefore IS a religion or worldview and you can't change the mind of a person who believes in it just as you can't change the mind of a cult member.
I applaud your attempt to inform people on this. Evolution is and always will be a theory.

Answer 7

And who created the creators eye?
I do not believe our eye is perfection. We do not see the furtherest or the best in the dark.
They do explain how it functions though.
Let everyones beliefs be there own.

Answer 8

Why must Creationists resort to flat out lying? ...oh, because they have no valid arguments to make and only have to convince other brain-dead red-necks.