Or, more precisely, should these relationships be recognized in our marriage laws?
Why or why not?
2007-02-05 23:19:24 · 4 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
If we're going to allow alternative lifestyles like gays to marry than we should probably allow anyone that wants to share a loving relationship together marry.
It will be interesting to see who will be the loudest opponents of this heteros or gays.
You would assume that heteros would oppose it the most because they are against redefining marriage.
It would seem that if gays are against it they would be hypocritical.
2007-02-05 23:32:23 · answer #1 · answered by whlydg 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its been around forever. Would it not be more wise to let them unite and have legal factors come into play if they "divorce". Might cut down on the partner swapping and cut down on the sexually transmitted diseases rate.
There are alot of married men and women that stay just so they dont have to pay for a divorce.
More would be buying home ect. So it would up the economy.
Not a supporter but at least they are not having unwanted children. Because they cant have any
2007-02-06 07:25:23 · answer #2 · answered by tammer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, marriage is defined as a union between a man and a woman, except for here in Canada where it's what ever floats your boat.....but come on we need to draw a moral line some where....basically what you are suggesting or asking is if should be OK for a man or woman to marry who ever and to as many people as they like...Divorce is at an all time high, morals are at a low...I think the two are connected....lets not make it worse....
2007-02-06 09:26:08 · answer #3 · answered by beans 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bi sexuality what does it matter as long as they are of the oposite sex i cant see a problem. They love who they like its their choice.
As for polygamists. It's illegal anyway. The Mormans used to be polygamists . Now they are just a damn nuisance
2007-02-06 07:31:00 · answer #4 · answered by Shelty K 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋