It went something like "I'm sorry we cannot resolve this problem, we have different levels of intelligence and cannot communicate on the same level?" I know that's not it, but in essence thats the text. Anyone know what I'm trying to quote. It's funny funny and sarcastic, and I'd really like the use it for something I'm debating about with someone.
2007-02-05 22:55:00 · 8 answers · asked by onespryguy55 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Why do you want to be sarcastic? You are only renforcing the other persons idea of who you are if you go that route. Usually someone like this will not accept the truth, or being corrected, if they realize that they are wrong about something. It is also usually my way or no way. Do you really want to be that way, or do you just want the *last word*?
2007-02-05 23:01:59 · answer #1 · answered by Ex Head 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you can agree to disagree, then you are thinking alike on some form of consciousness, and/or some level of awareness. In the essence of "making a comeback" - what are you really trying to do? Are you trying to "win" an arguement? This is juxtapositional upon each existing individual's beliefs. If you are driven to "prove a point", then you should be compelled to explore the truths of any given situation, regardless if you are limited in your ability to comprehend rational logic and emotional interpretation within the complex process of fearing, questioning, observing and processing the nature of human thought process. It is in every human being - the natural habituation to explore the fear of any given situation - hell, fear is the stimulus that forces a response in every passing moment. We all do this subconsciously every day. Have you ever isolated yourself as to act like a jackass, and take notice of how many people automatically question what you are doing? So why would you "prove a point" with a pointless remark of fallacious witticism pertaining towards your fulfillment of seeking ignorance within the context of understanding an individual's point of view in comparison with your own? Maybe it is because you enjoy disagreeing, and do not listen to other people enough, but this is merely a speculation on my own behalf. I would recommend listening to someone, rather than disagreeing with them. If you disagree with them, you don't always have to openly express this disagreement - hell, maybe you could learn something from them, especially if you disagree with their paths of logic. This will make you smarter in the end, so that you can correct the observation of a mistake within your own mind.
2007-02-06 12:22:58 · answer #2 · answered by _Third_Eye_ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
certain, they truly can. no matter if it variety of feels to me you already realized that because you position those on right here. I used to artwork at Wal-Mart as a cashier and that i discussed countless evidence. the unhappy ingredient is the clients each and every from time to time are not any brighter. i imagine it really is what scared me the most. I have a sister that when requested me (she develop into 20 some thing yrs. previous even as i develop into 12) the position a particular part of Missouri develop into placed. even as that would sound noticeably stupid, it receives worse. we stay in that section.
2016-11-25 19:54:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I offer this, my own opinion about that.
"Sometimes avoidance is the better way to end a debate, or disagreement. Silence so often, is the highest decible level conceiveable to ones own ear."
Steven Wolf
2007-02-06 01:27:59 · answer #4 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A good comeback to that would be, 'Never mind, if you try to educate yourself more our intelligence might level up a bit'
2007-02-05 22:58:59 · answer #5 · answered by malcolmg 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That one I don't know
This one I do
Great minds think alike
Only fools beg to differ
2007-02-05 23:04:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN " I REFUSE TO ENGAGE IN A BATTLE OF WITS WITH AN UNARMED OPPONENT".
2007-02-05 23:40:58 · answer #7 · answered by curmudgeon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
'We agree to disagree'
2007-02-06 02:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by Praxis 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋