Evolution and a "single cell" . Please read and then answer, thank you?

Question

A single cell is the most complex living structure.It is more complex than a city having involute systems, one in another.
This complex structure functions only if all its components are complete.Otherwise it diffuses and vanishes in a short time.
***
It can not wait millions of years to be completed by coincidences and start to function. ( as evolution "claims" )
***
Only this perfection & disposition of a single cell DOES PROVE THAT GOD EXISTS.
Of course , this is not the only thing to see how evolution is a comedy ,invalid, unscientific approach.
***
So how come some still believe this rubbish idea?

Hey Gnomon,
Will a cell go on its functions if there is no mitokondria?
Please think twice b4 you write something.

Answer 1

Which makes more sense?

1. Take a look at a Pepsi can. A billion years ago, there was a big bang and some brown goo appeared on a rock. Over time, it started to raise into the air and start to take shape into a hunk of metal. A million years later, it began to change into a larger hunk of metal that resembled a modern pop can. 10,000 years later it began to form a hole in the top and then a little thing called a 'tab' formed 1 million years later. After than, somehow red and blue paint appeared on the can and said 12 FL OZ (355 ml). The Nutrition facts took another million years. That is how a pop can came to be.

2. The Pepsi manufacturer or 'creator' made the pop can.

Okay, which one makes more sense to you?

I would hope you picked # 2. Otherwise a sane person might suggest you seek counseling.

If a pop can isn't evolved, but created, how could humans be the product of anything but a Creator?

Answer 2

How come people still believe this "rubbish" idea? Because most of what you have said is wrong.

A single cell is not the most complex living structure. Since multi-celled creatures are composed of a number of single cells, they are more complex than the single cells.

The complex structure does not only function if all its components are complete. WHere did you get this rubbish from? The individual parts of a cell can each function in the right environment.

Please don't try and point out flaws in a scientific theory by spouting ignorant misinformation.

Addition:

Will a cell work without mitochondria? Yes. Some simple cells do not have mitochondria. And mitochondria will work without a cell around them. In fact some people consider that mitochondria are an older type of life and lived without cells until the level of oxygen in the atmosphere got to high. At that stage they sought refuge inside cells.

Answer 3

Sorry, but your idea of proof is comical. There is a serious logical fallicy in your proof and that is why creationism can never be considered a serious scientific theory.

I have no problem with people believing in God. However, its when people try to push religious theories such as creationism as science, I actually find it quite offensive, particularly as there are far more holes in the idea of creationism than in evolution.

Answer 4

evolution doesn't say a single celled organisms came from coincidence. It says it evolved form a simpler life form.

Answer 5

LOL you can't even spell mitochondria.

There's never been a case of irreducible complexity demonstrated - but honestly - why keep looking? Why don't you idiots give up and go home once the evolutionary development has been demonstrated a few times?

Rubbish idea? That's what I keep asking myself - why don't you bit your ignorant creationist theories and get a life.

Answer 6

according to some theories scientists say that god exists but according to the theory of evolution by Darwin says that all the contents of life may evolved from non living objects

Answer 7

I believe that God exists- how else would we be sitting here, typing away on our keyboards right now?

There's "proof" of both people's points of views...but sooner or later we'll all know the real answer at the end of the day.

Answer 8

if there were no mitochondria then prokaryots never developed to eukaryots