DO YOU THINK A WORLD GOVERNTMENT CAN BE THAT POWERFUL TO SAVE OUR FUTURE.
2007-02-05 21:59:31 · 11 answers · asked by MAISARA K 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Self-interest, regionalism and tribalism are far more powerful human instincts. By the time they'd finished squabbling over who should lead it and carving up the gravy train to best suit themselves, it would just be another impotent UN cocktail party.
2007-02-05 22:05:35 · answer #1 · answered by Bart S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A democratic world wouldn't be the answer to a better planet. Even in the US (a democratic country) there is still major conflicts that the democracy hasn't resolve. Human rights are violated every day, take a look a the migratory issues, racism, and believe it or not there is even poverty in the States. The problem is not the democratic system but how and who develop the democratic system. Communism and Socialism is the solution, these are other injustice system that eliminate societies freedom and rights. World problems are not going to end by becoming democratic, when this world learns how to be equal, and just for everyone world problems will end.
2016-05-23 23:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
THE NECESSARY LAW FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Dominated by a powerful and natural instinct of survival, the human being has been transported through the pass of time toward his multiplication, to be able occupy completely some day our big and extensive planet. Two thosand and five hundred years ago, the Roman patricians promulgated the first shelter law (or guardianship) still today effective which, invites at the parents to give dress, bed and food at the minors age. With it, many minors could obtain the necessary condition, to be able to stop the activities that often being smalls they were forced.
Unfortunately for we, imagine the effects of a permanent or continuous shelter for the people who wish it, has been until today and impossible issue. Now, our first mision is recognize that, with it, we can obtain many benefits. First, the necessary apparatus to safeguard in a natural way, our demographic levels for the future coming. In second place, with this simple law, fredom source and basic for many citizens – we also could get the necessary condition to put the point and end to the social disorders and sufferings like wars, prostitution, the poverty, the illness, the hunger, drugs, delinquency, crimes, emigration...
And finally, like third point with a more just and human shelter, besides obtaining the fruits of freedom, we will obtain the natural apparatus to safeguard and control ours planetarious levels of contamination and degradation due our due to our old and altruistic system of consumption for the future coming.
The reform of this law is an exercise that we must realize between all as rapidly as possible to avoid the appearance of the new evils.
JOSEP CAMPS
SPAIN
After reflect about this, help me to show this page at the people
http://www.leypaz.com
thank you.
2007-02-09 08:50:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is absurd. Government rarely solves anything. World government will only take away the freedoms man has long fought for.
Take the UN for example. They are the most corrupt organization the world has ever known. -From serial child-rapers, to Oil-for-Food the UN has the largest network of scammers the world has ever known.
Pat Buchanan was right. We should send the Marines to evacuate the UN building in New York, as they are a freedom-hating, anti-American bunch.
2007-02-05 22:30:25 · answer #4 · answered by patriot333 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its worth a try, then again no government would be preferred. The world will have to solve its problems, governments seem to confuse then overburden with the taxes and bloat. Professional politicians get in the way of good works more than helping people.
2007-02-05 22:18:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Think about the various governments in the world today. Is there any one government that you would say is so honest, so in touch with its citizens, so righteous that you would choose it to rule the world? I did not think so. Remember power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. In my opinion the closer government is to the people the better it is.
2007-02-05 22:12:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
All government should be local. The bigger a government gets the more out of touch with its citizens it is and the more corrupt it gets.
2007-02-05 22:03:50 · answer #7 · answered by whlydg 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is the next natural step in the evoloution of man.
2007-02-05 22:05:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No...........................!!
What the rich want is a world government run by business. That way they wouldn't have to fight over resources!
2007-02-05 22:03:13 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
renaming problems don't fix anything, just renames them.
2007-02-05 22:14:17 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋